Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

> Would it make sense to extend the snapcraft yaml to let the developer > specify where build-packages and stage-packages should be taken from? > > It would be nice to be able to run a "snapcraft cleanbuild" from zesty > while effectively using all the packages from xenial+overlay... :-) That

Re: Package too old for cleanbuild

On 06/02/2017 09:53, Michi Henning wrote: > I’m trying to get thumbnailer to build with snapcraft cleanbuild. > > We depend on cmake-extras for the build. I’ve added that to the > build-packages list. The version of cmake that gets installed is 0.6, but we > need the latest 1.0. > > Is it

Reject snaps that are identical to previous revision?

So, I'm sure it comes as no surprise to the readers of this mailing list that I am a complete moron; and as further evidence of that, I recently uploaded a "new" snap that was actually identical to the revision I already had released to my victu...I mean, customers. Does it seem reasonable for

Package too old for cleanbuild

I’m trying to get thumbnailer to build with snapcraft cleanbuild. We depend on cmake-extras for the build. I’ve added that to the build-packages list. The version of cmake that gets installed is 0.6, but we need the latest 1.0. Is it possible to add the overlay PPA to cleanbuild somehow? If

Re: Snap icon in the Ubuntu Store

Any chance the snap in question has an icon set store side? I believe the one in the store takes precedence over the one in the snap itself. Kyle On Feb 5, 2017 4:47 PM, "XiaoGuo Liu" wrote: > I just found another problem with snapweb. If I change the icon to another

Re: Max retries exceeded?

> Can you try: > $ lxc exec snapcraft-merely-model-ewe -- curl > https://parts.snapcraft.io/v1/parts.yaml > > > ? I can only confirm that curling that from various machines here responds > fine (and that there haven't been any alerts for that service

Re: Max retries exceeded?

On 6 February 2017 at 11:47, Michael Nelson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:25 PM Michi Henning > wrote: >> >> I keep getting this error when doing a snapcraft cleanbuild. Any >> suggestions? I checked name resolution, and my DNS

Re: Max retries exceeded?

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:25 PM Michi Henning wrote: > I keep getting this error when doing a snapcraft cleanbuild. Any > suggestions? I checked name resolution, and my DNS resolves > parts.snapcraft.io just fine. > > Hi Michi Have you verified your DNS resolution

Max retries exceeded?

I keep getting this error when doing a snapcraft cleanbuild. Any suggestions? I checked name resolution, and my DNS resolves parts.snapcraft.io just fine. Thanks, Michi. Setting up python3-lxml (3.5.0-1build1) ... Setting up python3-petname (2.0-0ubuntu1~16.04)

Re: Snap icon in the Ubuntu Store

I just found another problem with snapweb. If I change the icon to another picture in the snapcraft.yaml file, after new installation, the package icon in the snapweb is not updated, and the old one is still used. Is this a bug? Thanks & best regards, XiaoGuo On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:15 AM,

Re: snapcraft 2.26 has been released

On 06/02/17 00:04, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 06/02/17 00:00, Sergio Schvezov wrote: Where did you see this documented? We removed all traces of license.txt from our documentation months ago as snapd made no use of it. That said you are free to drop license file inside the snap wherever

Re: snapcraft 2.26 has been released

On 06/02/17 00:00, Sergio Schvezov wrote: Where did you see this documented? We removed all traces of license.txt from our documentation months ago as snapd made no use of it. That said you are free to drop license file inside the snap wherever you want. I didn't see it documented anywhere --

Re: snapcraft 2.26 has been released

El viernes, 3 de febrero de 2017 20h'17:30 ART, Joseph Rushton Wakeling escribió: On 03/02/17 12:57, Sergio Schvezov wrote: Hello snapcrafters! We are pleased to announce the release of version `2.26` of snapcraft has been released:

Re: Using docker for clean builds of classic snaps

On 05/02/17 19:33, Loïc Minier wrote: I dont think "snapd" is in the "ubuntu" Docker image which is trimmed down a bit Yes, I gathered that much, which is why my own Dockerfile attempt ensured that snapd would be installed with this line: RUN apt-get --assume-yes install snapd snapcraft

Re: Using docker for clean builds of classic snaps

Hi Joseph, On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling < joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > $ sudo docker run -v $PWD:$PWD -w $PWD [my-image-id] snap install core && > snapcraft clean && snapcraft > 2017/02/05 14:07:35.998824 main.go:220: WARNING: cannot create syslog > logger >

Re: Gradle Plugin / dump plugin with jre dependency

Unfortunately, to get the Java dependencies, this is the only way to get them. Snapd doesn't have Java, so it must come in the snap. On Feb 5, 2017 11:58 AM, "Felix Natter" wrote: > hello Matthew, > > I apologize for the very late reply. > > Many thanks for the gradle.py

Re: Using docker for clean builds of classic snaps

On 02/02/17 22:35, Loïc Minier wrote: There are a bunch of Docker images providing snapcraft , unfortunately they are all behind. These should be autobuilt instead of manually updated, in the mean time I suggest you build your own

Re: please try my golang snap

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Shuduo Sang wrote: > Hi, > > I got following output after run it: > > $ go-17-mwhudson.go-17 > /snap/go-17-mwhudson/2/gowrapper: line 3: /snap/go-17-mwhudson/2/bin/go: > No such file or directory > > My snap version is: > $ snap version