explicit priming

2017-03-31 Thread Spencer Parkin
Hi, My snapcraft.yaml file... https://github.com/spencerparkin/TwistyPuzzle/blob/stable-release/Snap/snapcraft.yaml ...as you can see, has a new "prime:" section in it. This wasn't needed in all my earlier snappings, but to finally get my program snapping correctly again, I've had to explicitly

Re: desktop-gtk3

2017-03-31 Thread Spencer Parkin
Thanks, Didier. I was on 2.19 of snapcraft. Apparently I was way out of date. Now it is working again, and you can all bask in the glory of my latest release to be uploaded shortly. BTW, I have some snaps that I've uploaded and published, but their total peices of garbage. I can unpublish them

Re: Getting snapcraft.yaml version from a script

2017-03-31 Thread Sergio Schvezov
On Mar 31, 2017 4:57 PM, "Gregory Lutostanski" < gregory.lutostan...@canonical.com> wrote: Curious how everyone makes sure the version string in the snapcraft.yaml up to date. And if there is an easy way to essentially drive it via 'git tags' and 'git describe'. If anyone has an recipe I would be

Re: ANN: snapcraft 2.28 has been released

2017-03-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 31/03/17 11:37, Colin Watson wrote: >> Current NIST policy recommends SHA256 as a minimum, > > Since we're starting something new, I would prefer us to be well off the > minimum. > >> and says "Currently >> there is no need to transit

Re: ANN: snapcraft 2.28 has been released

2017-03-31 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 31/03/17 11:37, Colin Watson wrote: > Current NIST policy recommends SHA256 as a minimum, Since we're starting something new, I would prefer us to be well off the minimum. > and says "Currently > there is no need to transition applications from SHA-2 to SHA-3", dated > 2015-08-05 (http://csrc

Getting snapcraft.yaml version from a script

2017-03-31 Thread Gregory Lutostanski
Curious how everyone makes sure the version string in the snapcraft.yaml up to date. And if there is an easy way to essentially drive it via 'git tags' and 'git describe'. If anyone has an recipe I would be very happy to use it across my repos. I've tried the following prepare script: sed -i

Re: Updating cloud part

2017-03-31 Thread Tim Süberkrüb
+1, thanks, Alan! On 31.03.2017 18:51, Alan Pope wrote: On 31 March 2017 at 17:41, Tim Süberkrüb wrote: ah, thanks for that info. So I guess '/' in part names has been deprecated? Yes. Some docs for cloud parts in general would be nice ;) Agreed. https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/snappy-d

Re: Updating cloud part

2017-03-31 Thread Alan Pope
On 31 March 2017 at 17:41, Tim Süberkrüb wrote: > ah, thanks for that info. So I guess '/' in part names has been deprecated? > Yes. > Some docs for cloud parts in general would be nice ;) > Agreed. https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/snappy-docs/issues/54 :) -- Alan Pope Snap Advocate Canonica

Re: Updating cloud part

2017-03-31 Thread Tim Süberkrüb
Hey Joe, ah, thanks for that info. So I guess '/' in part names has been deprecated? Some docs for cloud parts in general would be nice ;) All the best, Tim On 31.03.2017 18:37, Joe Talbott wrote: Hi Tim, Don't use '/' in part names. Rename 'liri-platform/v0.10.0' to 'liri-platform-v0.10.

Re: Updating cloud part

2017-03-31 Thread Joe Talbott
Hi Tim, Don't use '/' in part names. Rename 'liri-platform/v0.10.0' to 'liri-platform-v0.10.0' and update the snapcraft.yaml at https://github.com/lirios/snapcraft-parts.git to use that as the part name not the nested naming you have there now. That should get things updated for you. Thanks, Jo

Re: Updating cloud part

2017-03-31 Thread Tim Süberkrüb
Hey Joe, thanks for your reply. Yeah, I know but I updated it here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/snapcraft/parts (see entry at the very bottom). I already checked snapcraft update/search and the API url. All the best, Tim On 31.03.2017 18:24, Joe Talbott wrote: I see 'liri-app' here https://p

Re: Updating cloud part

2017-03-31 Thread Joe Talbott
I see 'liri-app' here https://parts.snapcraft.io/v1/parts.yaml Make sure you run 'snapcraft update' to download the latest parts.yaml file. Joe On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Tim Süberkrüb wrote: > Hey, > > I made some changes to the Liri cloud part few hours earlier, but > parts.snapcraft.i

Updating cloud part

2017-03-31 Thread Tim Süberkrüb
Hey, I made some changes to the Liri cloud part few hours earlier, but parts.snapcraft.io still hasn't updated. Is there a problem with my changes or am I just too impatient? ;) All the best, Tim -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: htt

Re: Issues using dbus in strict

2017-03-31 Thread knitzsche
Hi folks, any tips here to unblock this critical issue? Thanks On 03/31/2017 10:55 AM, Sergey Borovkov wrote: Hi. I am running a couple of daemons (daemon: simple) and they interact between each other using dbus. Unfortunately I've ran into the issue when porting them from devmode to strict, I a

Re: Issues creating webapps snaps with stric confinement

2017-03-31 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi Vincent, What plugs did you use? This is a quick&dirty snap I assembled recently which I tested successfully on top of X11: https://github.com/lool/soracom-console-snap/blob/master/snapcraft.yaml Cheers, - Loïc On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Vincent JOBARD wrote: > Hi Everyone > > I just

Re: ANN: snapcraft 2.28 has been released

2017-03-31 Thread Kyle Fazzari
On 03/31/2017 03:37 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:22:50AM +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: >> On 30/03/17 20:54, Sergio Schvezov wrote: >>> ### sources >>> >>> Sources, thanks to an external contributor, can now make use of a new >>> entry, `source-checksum` which can be ad

Issues using dbus in strict

2017-03-31 Thread Sergey Borovkov
Hi. I am running a couple of daemons (daemon: simple) and they interact between each other using dbus. Unfortunately I've ran into the issue when porting them from devmode to strict, I am getting this backtrace just trying to obtain SystemBus in python: Mar 31 12:44:02 localhost.localdomain snap[1

Issues creating webapps snaps with stric confinement

2017-03-31 Thread Vincent JOBARD
Hi Everyone I just try to follow the tutorial to learn how to create webapps snaps using snapcraft. ( https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/phone/web/ubuntu-webapps-guide/, very nice tutorial by the way) Unfortunately, when I try to create my snap with strict confinement, I have a network Error page, b

Re: ANN: snapcraft 2.28 has been released

2017-03-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:22:50AM +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 30/03/17 20:54, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > > ### sources > > > > Sources, thanks to an external contributor, can now make use of a new > > entry, `source-checksum` which can be added to sources that can be hashed, > > the forma

Re: ANN: snapcraft 2.28 has been released

2017-03-31 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
What a great release, thank you! Only one request: On 30/03/17 20:54, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > ### sources > > Sources, thanks to an external contributor, can now make use of a new entry, > `source-checksum` which can be added to sources that can be hashed, the > format is the following: `sourc

Re: classic 32 bit application

2017-03-31 Thread James Henstridge
On 31 March 2017 at 05:38, Seth Arnold wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:10:26AM +0200, Alistair Grant wrote: >> I'm trying to package a 32 bit software development environment: Pharo >> Smalltalk (http://pharo.org). >> >> I've got it working OK as a devmode package, but as soon as I switch it >

Re: desktop-gtk3

2017-03-31 Thread Didier Roche
Le 31/03/2017 à 05:55, Spencer Parkin a écrit : That just adds a deprecation warning (if I add the '/', I mean.) It says, "DEPRECATED: Found a "/" in the name of the 'desktiop/gtk3' part" Here's the major error I'm getting... "Issue while loading plugin: properties failed to load for desktop-g