Hi Gustavo,
Good to hear. Let me also publish this article: [Snappy Interfaces revisit]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1stvuyn6evk9df7s58ZSAq7g5QOV5gxmWCVqiyEuwDDs/edit?usp=sharing
Feel like the work flow in page 3 need to update after you release the new
snapd. YC
2016-12-14 10:40 GMT+08:0
IMHO. a password only works for console but not for internet is more secure
and developer will appreciate.
2016-12-14 8:40 GMT+08:00 Mark Shuttleworth :
> On 13/12/16 19:35, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > I'm very confused. You have SSO. You tell people to create an SSO
> > account to use the device. Ye
one. We should probably not blacklist the current revision if
> the snap name was explicitly selected in the command line.
>
> On Oct 27, 2016 4:39 AM, "Didier Roche" wrote:
>
>> Le 27/10/2016 à 08:32, YC Cheng a écrit :
>>
>> I think we need a way to just Un
Fire another bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1637119, YC
2016-10-27 16:06 GMT+08:00 Didier Roche :
> Le 27/10/2016 à 09:44, YC Cheng a écrit :
>
> Reply in-line, YC
>
> 2016-10-27 15:36 GMT+08:00 Didier Roche :
>
>> Le 27/10/2016 à 09:18, YC Cheng
Reply in-line, YC
2016-10-27 15:36 GMT+08:00 Didier Roche :
> Le 27/10/2016 à 09:18, YC Cheng a écrit :
>
> I found the following command works:
>
> snap revert --revision 29
>
> as expected.
>
>
> Indeed,
> you will notice though that any new data which have be
Le 27/10/2016 à 08:32, YC Cheng a écrit :
>
> I think we need a way to just Un-revert from rev 20 to rev 29 without
> remove rev 29.
>
> Shall we fire a bug for that if we don't have such method exists now ?
>
>
> I think it's not that easy considering the associate
I think we need a way to just Un-revert from rev 20 to rev 29 without
remove rev 29.
Shall we fire a bug for that if we don't have such method exists now ?
2016-10-27 14:13 GMT+08:00 Didier Roche :
> Le 27/10/2016 à 03:01, Marcos Alano a écrit :
> > Hello guys,
>
> Hey Marcos,
> >
> >
> > Sorry
snapcraft from docker as an officially supported image too, I figured it
> would be nice to have it on armhf too for people building on rpi2/3.
>
> Cheers,
> - Loïc
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:31 AM, YC Cheng wrote:
>
>> Hi Loic,
>>
>> Maybe you already
Hi Loic,
Maybe you already knew that https://hub.docker.com/r/vicamo/ubuntu/tags/
have both
xenial-arm64 and xenial-armhf tag.
YC
2016-09-12 23:00 GMT+08:00 Loïc Minier :
> Hi folks,
>
> Could we also get the docker container snapcore/snapcraft built for ARM?
> (I'm using classic mode for now
