2017-02-08 14:37 GMT-02:00 Olivier Tilloy :
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Simon Fels
> wrote:
> Where can this be requested?
>
>
+1.
Sorry, this is a hijack.
I would like to see an interfaces revamp/discussion. E. g.:
- my snap is useless without process-control, but works without home [1].
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Simon Fels wrote:
> On 07.02.2017 15:36, knitzsche wrote:
>> What is the approach to connect interfaces that are not auto-connecting
>> without user intervention?
>>
>> That is, there's a snap (built into an image) that declares the
>> log-observe plug. Log-observe
On 07/02/17 14:43, Simon Fels wrote:
> On 07.02.2017 15:36, knitzsche wrote:
>> What is the approach to connect interfaces that are not auto-connecting
>> without user intervention?
>>
>> That is, there's a snap (built into an image) that declares the
>> log-observe plug. Log-observe interface does
On 07.02.2017 15:36, knitzsche wrote:
> What is the approach to connect interfaces that are not auto-connecting
> without user intervention?
>
> That is, there's a snap (built into an image) that declares the
> log-observe plug. Log-observe interface does not auto-connect [1]. In
> this product, t
What is the approach to connect interfaces that are not auto-connecting
without user intervention?
That is, there's a snap (built into an image) that declares the
log-observe plug. Log-observe interface does not auto-connect [1]. In
this product, the user does not have a console, so they canno
