Re[2]: [sniffer] Experimental hits on bounce messages

2004-06-14 Thread Pete McNeil
On Monday, June 14, 2004, 1:56:00 AM, Matt wrote: M Pete, M Experimental.  If these rules were in a differentcategory, it would M make me feel a lot better about it.  I'm guessingmaybe from my M standpoint, Spamware would be the most appropriatecategory for M tagging forged message ID's of this

[sniffer] Declude configuration

2004-06-14 Thread John Tolmachoff (Lists)
I am new to Sniffer, and have it up and running with the basic line looking for a nonzero return code. I would now like to start setting different weights for different return codes. Does some one have a example configuration I can use? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For

Re: [sniffer] Declude configuration

2004-06-14 Thread Scott Fisher
Here's what I use: My subject tag weight is 100 points. So in general sniffer weighs in at 90%. The greymail (60) needs some taming. I run a greymail whitelist to credit back 42 points to those that I don't consider spam. That's the only code you really need to be wary of. You may tend to get

RE: [sniffer] Declude configuration

2004-06-14 Thread Landry William
Here is a sample of what I use: = SNIFFER-TRAVEL external 047 M:\IMail\Declude\TPA\Sniffer\YourLicenseID.exe YourAuthCode 05 0 SNIFFER-INSURANCE external 048 M:\IMail\Declude\TPA\Sniffer\YourLicenseID.exe YourAuthCode 10 0 SNIFFER-AV-PUSH external 049