[sniffer] Missing Junk

2004-11-04 Thread Frederick Samarelli
I am seeing a high rate of junk slipping past Sniffer over the past week. Has anything changed. Fred This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html

Re: [sniffer] Missing Junk

2004-11-04 Thread Pete McNeil
On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 9:11:50 AM, Frederick wrote: FS> I am seeing a high rate of junk slipping past Sniffer over the past week. FS> Has anything changed. Nothing has changed on this end. I have checked your license - it is current and is recompiling regularly. Your rule strength thre

Re: [sniffer] Missing Junk

2004-11-04 Thread Jorge Asch
FS> Has anything changed. Pete, just checking. I sent you en amil about 60 minutes ago. You got it? BTW, I've noticed an increased stream of spam here too starting yesterday. -- Jorge Asch Revilla CONEXION DCR www.conexion.co.cr 800-CONEXION This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing li

Re: [sniffer] Missing Junk

2004-11-04 Thread Jorge Asch
I have checked your license - it is current and is recompiling regularly. Never mind. I found this on my log today: ob3gpi2s20041104060505-INITIALIZING-00 ERROR_RULE_AUTH730000 ob3gpi2s20041104060546-INITIALIZING-00 ERROR_RULE_AUTH

Re[2]: [sniffer] Missing Junk

2004-11-04 Thread Pete McNeil
On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 10:04:30 AM, Jorge wrote: >>I have checked your license - it is current and is recompiling >>regularly. >> >> JA> Never mind. I found this on my log today: JA> ob3gpi2s20041104060505-INITIALIZING-00 JA> ERROR_RULE_AUTH730000

Re: [sniffer] Missing Junk

2004-11-04 Thread Jorge Asch
That would explain the extra spam. This probably has to do with the error I sent you earlier... -- Jorge Asch Revilla CONEXION DCR www.conexion.co.cr 800-CONEXION This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmons

Re[2]: [sniffer] Missing Junk

2004-11-04 Thread Pete McNeil
On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 10:41:59 AM, Jorge wrote: >>That would explain the extra spam. >> >> JA> This probably has to do with the error I sent you earlier... I tracked down a message from you in the spam corpus - the top of the message asks why the message got through. I'm guessing it g

Re: [sniffer] Missing Junk

2004-11-04 Thread Jorge Asch
I tracked down a message from you in the spam corpus - the top of the message asks why the message got through. I'm guessing it got captured on this end due to the filter that _should_ have captured it on your end. Does that make sense? Nope. Because as far as I know the filter that should have

Re[2]: [sniffer] Missing Junk

2004-11-04 Thread Pete McNeil
On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 10:56:04 AM, Jorge wrote: >>I tracked down a message from you in the spam corpus - the top of the >>message asks why the message got through. I'm guessing it got captured >>on this end due to the filter that _should_ have captured it on your >>end. Does that make se

[sniffer] When sending spam examples to us...

2004-11-04 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Sniffer Folks, When you want to send spam samples to us at support@, please remember that our systems are heavily filtered and so it is likely that we won't see your message unless you compress it first. If you want to send us a sample so that we can talk about it please always zi

[sniffer] Mdaemon

2004-11-04 Thread Jorge Asch
Pete, just as a comment, that the new Mdaemon version has a custom plug in support. Perhaps you should take a look and see how easy/difficult it would be to integrade Message Sniffer at all, if that's desired. This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscr

Re: [sniffer] Mdaemon

2004-11-04 Thread Pete McNeil
On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 8:39:20 PM, Jorge wrote: JA> Pete, just as a comment, that the new Mdaemon version has a custom plug JA> in support. Perhaps you should take a look and see how easy/difficult it JA> would be to integrade Message Sniffer at all, if that's desired. I didn't know that