RE: [sniffer] Declude and Sniffer

2005-07-21 Thread Dan Horne
I weight sniffer high enough to hold the message on its own. We use it as our blacklist and it works great. We get some false positives, but we whitelist those and move on. Our users forward all spam received in their inbox to an email address that the sniffer system checks automatically. It

Re[2]: [sniffer] Declude and Sniffer

2005-07-21 Thread Pete McNeil
On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 12:01:32 PM, Darin wrote: DC I thought we were supposed to just forward these as attachments to the spam@ DC address? We're trying to move away from that :-) poping the messages is more scalable. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For

Re[2]: [sniffer] Declude and Sniffer

2005-07-21 Thread Pete McNeil
On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 1:12:18 PM, Dan wrote: DH That helps to tune the overall rulebase, but this tunes MY rulebase to DH the types of spam that we receive. If I send it to the spam@ address it DH may or may not get added to the rulebase. Done this way, I KNOW it is DH going to be added

Re[4]: [sniffer] Declude and Sniffer

2005-07-21 Thread Pete McNeil
We're not making a big deal of it just yet, but anyone who would like to switch please do let us know. The bot we have doing this job is very simplistic. We need: Email Address (Account Name), Server name, Password Our bot connects to Server name and logs in with Email Address using Password.