Re: [SNMP4J] v2 PDU in v1 message

2012-11-29 Thread Frank Fock
...@agentpp.org] on behalf of Frank Fock [f...@agentpp.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 5:12 PM To: snmp4j@agentpp.org Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] v2 PDU in v1 message Hello Jerome, I will not add code to SNMP4J that violates the SNMP standards. If you need such code, you are free to change

Re: [SNMP4J] v2 PDU in v1 message

2012-11-28 Thread Jerome Callaghan
From: snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org [snmp4j-boun...@agentpp.org] on behalf of Frank Fock [f...@agentpp.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 5:12 PM To: snmp4j@agentpp.org Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] v2 PDU in v1 message Hello Jerome, I will not add code to SNMP4J that violates the SNMP

Re: [SNMP4J] v2 PDU in v1 message

2012-11-26 Thread Frank Fock
Hello Jerome, I will not add code to SNMP4J that violates the SNMP standards. If you need such code, you are free to change it in your version. Nevertheless, if some hook methods would help you to clarly separate your code from the SNMP4J code, I am willing to add such hook methods. Best