RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer

+1 >From: "Sahoo, Ajaya (GMI, CSSD)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer >Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:00:42 -0400 > > +1 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Gaur, Deepak [SMTP:[

Re: How to serialize/deserialize this Class?

"Class Employee referes to itself through manager, subordinates. I know that XML does not permit nesting, i.e, within employee tag you can not again have employee tags. " I know for sure that XML allows nesting so that X can contain Y and Y can inturn contain X. Raj >From: Soumen Sarkar <[EMA

RE: SOAP Performance against RMI

RMI/CORBA relies on stubs and skeletons. Therefore It need close coordination between the two ends that are communicating. If I make a change in the specification, I have to make changes at both ends. (In SOAP the changes at both ends are not mandated and can be made optionally). SOAP is a loo

Re: SPAM messages being received through this list.

Just leave the list as it iswe could revisit this issue though, if the spam becomes more severe than it is. Raj >From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: SPAM messages being received through this list. >Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21

Re: VOTE: Release v2.2

+1 >From: "Matthew J. Duftler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: "soap-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: VOTE: Release v2.2 >Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:18:27 -0400 > >Hi All, > >Well, I think it's time to vote on releasing v2.2. The only changes from >v2.2RC3 are the addition