;Dirk-Willem van Gulik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 00:06
Subject: Re: Faults and HTTP
>
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Scott Nichol wrote:
>
> > Section 6.2 of SOAP 1.1 states
> >
> > >>>>
> > SOAP HT
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Scott Nichol wrote:
> Section 6.2 of SOAP 1.1 states
>
>
> SOAP HTTP follows the semantics of the HTTP Status codes for communicating
> status information in HTTP. For example, a 2xx status code indicates that
> the client's request including the SOAP component was succ
<<
I read the MUST in the second paragraph as requiring faults to be returned
with a 500 status.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Englander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 17:16
Subject: Fa
Does anyone know if SOAP Faults are required to be
returned using an HTTP Error? i.e. is it valid to
have a server respond with a Fault using HTTP/1.X 200 OK?
The spec doesn't seem to say one way or the other.
Thanks.
