> Another question - should we maintain jdk1.1 compatibility (access
Hash
> table members through Enumeration)?
The code base no longer compiles with JDK 1.1. The number of places
where compilation fails is very limited, so it would be possible to work
to make a useful subset of the build work f
--Original Message-
> From: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 6:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: TODO list
>
>
> I've updated the TODO list which can be viewd at
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs
-Original Message-
From: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 17:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TODO list
I've updated the TODO list which can be viewd at
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/xml-soap/TODO?rev=HEAD&cont
D]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:49 PM
Subject: Re: TODO list
> I am not sure why Socket is used. It was used in the first version
> checked into CVS
> (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-soap/java/src/org/apache/soap/uti
> l/net/HTTPUtils.java?rev=1.1&content-type=tex
cc:
Subject: Re: TODO list
> I am not sure why Socket is used. It was used in the first version
> checked into CVS
> (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-soap/java/src/org/apache/soap/uti
> l/net/HTTPUtils.java?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup).
> Maybe it was because HTTP is relatively easy to implement, or
m: "Pavel Ausianik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:38 PM
Subject: RE: TODO list
> Scott,
>
> I just thought if I can help implementing "- follow HTTP redirects on
the
> client". However after first look I see th
ing?
Best regards,
Pavel
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 6:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: TODO list
>
>
> I've updated the TODO list which can be vi
I've updated the TODO list which can be viewd at
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/xml-soap/TODO?rev=HEAD&cont
ent-type=text/plain. Anyone who has considering contributing should
have a look. I am especially eager to have support for more XML schema
primitive types and su
Thanks Scott!
-Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Nichol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: TODO list item
> Mike,
>
> The e-mail below was the commit for the TODO list stuff. The
Mike,
The e-mail below was the commit for the TODO list stuff. There is even a
(trivial) sample.
Thanks for the contribution.
Scott Nichol
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:16 AM
Subject: cvs commit: x
Not there yet, but it *will* be.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: TODO list item
> So it's there? Cool!
> -Mike
>
> - Origi
So it's there? Cool!
-Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Nichol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: TODO list item
> Yes, in modified form with the additional properties sources (e.g.
>
Yes, in modified form with the additional properties sources (e.g.
deployment descriptor).
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: TODO list item
> Hi
Hi Scott,
Any chance of that diff making it into the codebase?
(in whatever form)
-Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Nichol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: TODO list item
> See my comm
See my comments below. If any other committers would like to comment,
please do so soon. Thanks.
Scott Nichol
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: TODO list it
g as I can pass some kind of
init params to
a service class instance.
What do you think?
-Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Nichol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: TODO list item
> Mike,
>
>
"William A. Nagy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: TODO list item
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for your diff. Right now we're trying to finish up the 2.3
> release, and are not currently adding new functionali
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your diff. Right now we're trying to finish up the 2.3
release, and are not currently adding new functionality until it's
done. We will look at your patch after the release and commit it to
the CVS tree if everything looks OK.
-Bill
> Hi,
>
> I notic
t; }
>
And here's the Configurable interface:
package org.apache.soap.providers;
import java.util.Properties;
public interface Configurable
{
public void configure(Properties props);
}
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
Hi,
I noticed on the TODO list the following item:
"
General Wish List:
==
- Add an interface such that if the service class implements that interface
the SOAP engine will call a method (ie. setContext() ) with context
information. Similar to the SOAPContext 'bag'
21 matches
Mail list logo
