Sure. But if you use arrays and
your objects are beans, you don't need to serialize anything on the Apache
side.
Robert
-Original Message-From: Lei Zhang-NonTRW
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001
10:15 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: About
vec
Title: RE: About vector
You could change the mapping in the soap registry but that would be a bad idea.
If interoperability with non-apache soap is important have found that the best thing to do is simplify the service interface to use arrays and not use Java collection classes.
Robert
--
Title: Jrun 2.3 configuration?
Hi
We have some customers using an old Jrun 2.3 servlet engine. Does anybody have any information on configuring Apache SOAP on this version?
regards,
Robert
Title: RE: No Deserialize found
you have a typo. see x:metedata
encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
xmlns:x="metadata-rsscatalog" qname="x:metedata"
javaType="edu.vt.ward.rss.catalog.ChannelMetadata"
that there is a old posting on the Apache discussion
group about this issue but the posting said that the problem
was resolved in the MS Toolkit Beta 2 a while ago. I'm using
the SP2 version currently posted on the MSDN site so this
shouldn't be a problem.
regards,
Robert
Rob
Title: RE: Java 2 WSDL
You probably need to do it by hand.
Robert Larson
Sr Architect
Saba
www.saba.com
+1 (650) 581-2559
-Original Message-
From: Di Maio Guido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 6:59 AM
To: Soap-User Mailing List (E-mail)
Subject
n into it, please let me know what your configuration is.
Hope this helps.
Robert Larson
Sr Architect
Saba
www.saba.com
+1 (650) 581-2559
http://xml.apache.org/xml-soap/deployment" id="urn:hcdm-content-core">
scope="Application"
