RE: XML Payload Performance

2001-12-03 Thread boehme
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:48 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: XML Payload Performance > > > Have you tried modifying your SOAP service to print out the input String to > sdtout and comparing the performance differences? > > I am just trying to ma

RE: XML Payload Performance

2001-11-30 Thread Sam Ruby
Mike Hashimoto wrote: > > Is it possible Soap internally takes the XML and converts it to a DOM > document in this transformation process? There must be some kind of > overhead like this in addition to the char transform going on. In fact, XML Soap 2.x does convert the XML into a DOM in order to

RE: XML Payload Performance

2001-11-30 Thread Wilkins, Craig
ck at the soap service level. This is quirky and I wouldn't do it, but I figured that I would through it out there. Good Luck.. Craig -Original Message- From: Hashimoto, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 5:41 PM To: Soap (E-mail) Subject: RE: XML Payl

RE: XML Payload Performance

2001-11-30 Thread Vinod Soni
to pass a simple string value also which contains characters which gets escaped, does the SOAP server interpret them accordingly ? -Original Message- From: Hashimoto, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 November 2001 22:41 To: Soap (E-mail) Subject: RE: XML Payload Performance Craig

RE: XML Payload Performance

2001-11-30 Thread Hashimoto, Mike
hows memory is not an issue. The CPU is railed at 100%, so Soap is thinking hard. Is it possible Soap internally takes the XML and converts it to a DOM document in this transformation process? There must be some kind of overhead like this in addition to the char transform going on. Any insight apprec

RE: XML Payload Performance

2001-11-30 Thread Wilkins, Craig
ssage- From: Hashimoto, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:46 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: XML Payload Performance With an XML payload string, all of the '<' char's are transformed (escaped) into "<", likewise

RE: XML Payload Performance

2001-11-30 Thread Hashimoto, Mike
ig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:46 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: XML Payload Performance Compare the SOAP message payload of the 300K string to the payload of the String that is XML? There has to be something different. What does your soap

RE: XML Payload Performance

2001-11-29 Thread Wilkins, Craig
see the same performance issue? -Original Message- From: Hashimoto, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:06 PM To: Soap (E-mail) Subject: XML Payload Performance Hello All, Problem: Shipping an XML string, ~300K in length. When Apache Soap 2.2 receives

XML Payload Performance

2001-11-29 Thread Hashimoto, Mike
Hello All, Problem: Shipping an XML string, ~300K in length. When Apache Soap 2.2 receives, it takes about 35+ sec's before the actual method on the server side gets dispatched! There are many tags and the marshalling/unmarshalling of the XML data is causing the extreme delay. The server CPU i