Here ya go.www.northcountyflyingmachines.com
Enjoy,Gary
- Original Message -
From: Ed Berris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:54 PM
Subject: [RCSE] Harris Nelson Web Page
Someone posted a web page where Harris' designs are being offered.
I have no idea if that is a significant value, but it seems minor
compared to the other sources of drag. Again, IMO.
I'm from Missouri... :)
Wow! Lets see, Rads makes the plane quieter. Quieter means less drag and
that means higher efficiency. That means you stay up longer,
This is true. However, it should be mentioned that polyester finishing
resin has a wax added to it to help cure. This should be removed with some
sort of solvent before attempting to bond to it with epoxy. I asume you are
not trying to apply an epoxy/mek combo to the fiberglass.
Kristopher
No need for RDS in tail applications in large scale ships.(especially
T-tails) Direct servo linkages which are simple,quick, and strong can be
routed inside the fuselage with servos in the tail, no problem.
An exception would be if you felt it neccassary to split the elevator and
put servos in
John has it right. It would only be applicable where a tail surface is
hinged.
- Original Message -
From: John Derstine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: [RCSE] Harley's comment on RDS
No need for RDS in tail applications
5 matches
Mail list logo