Mark,

I have always wondered how high someone can throw a plane.  Sometimes I
think it is a fish story, But if you canm get 90 ft, that is extremely
amazing.  I have yet to see even Wurts get 90 ft.  There was thread on RCSE
about throwing heights some time ago.  While I am open for proof, 6o ft is
high for anybody, with any glider.  If yo are getting 50 seconds from a 90
ft launch, then again, (in my humble opinion) the plane should be
redesigned.  I would love to see you do it at Visalia if we make it there.

Good Lift,

Chris




>How high are you launching?
>I can get a good 60 to 90 ft. launch by side arm
>throwing if the plane is fairly rigid. If the tape is
>loose, it will only launch half as high and be squirrly as hell,
>It's kind of fun though, like russian roulette, you never know which
>way it will be going when it tops out! A rigid spar or good tape job
>fixes this anomoly though.
>I can get 30 to 50 second dead air flights on a good launch.
>2 to 3 seconds on a really bad launch :~(
>
>         Mark Mech
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   www.aerofoam.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Breck Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 9:23 AM
>Subject: [RCSE] Dead air times with noseeum
>
>
>>
>>What are folks getting for deadair time on their Noseeums? I am good for,
>tops, 15 sec
>>and I just want to make sure that someone is doing better before I do my
>'rebuild'
>>which will address some aerodynamic/weight issues. I am in at 3.8 oz with
>smallish winglets.
>>
>>email direct is probably better since this is pretty specific stuff.
>>
>>thanks
>>
>>breck
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe"
and
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to