Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-30 Thread James V. Bacus
I always know you are smiling, dude... 8-) At 03:47 PM 6/29/2005, rdwoebke wrote: :-) Smiley added for Jim and other's benefit! Jim Downers Grove, IL Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net RCSE-List facilities pro

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-30 Thread rdwoebke
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Lachowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Friends don't let friends fly 2M. > > Anyway, if you want classes that require real skill, I look forward to you > entering F3b at next years Nats. > What!!?? 2 Meters suck? I just spent like 8 months building one!

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread James V. Bacus
Heh heh heh... ya, your memory is excellent... (Q: What's worse than having a close zero landing? A: Having DP confirm it for you.) At 06:28 PM 6/29/2005, you wrote: <<(I travel to a lot of contests, I've contested in AZ before). JB - Wasn't it you that got an actual measured 0 on an AMA

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Daryl Perkins
<<(I travel to a lot of contests, I've contested in AZ before). JB - Wasn't it you that got an actual measured 0 on an AMA tape in AZ? If it wasn't you... who the heck was that? That cracked me up... ;-) D __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo!

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread James V. Bacus
At 11:14 AM 6/29/2005, Justin Ammon wrote: Jim, Don't hold your breath for any special show of talent, but I do enjoy flying all of the classes...Well...Except for maybe RES, but I guess I can catch up on some sleep during the flights... None the less, now I am looking forward to meeting you

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Chuck Anderson
At 11:57 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote: Friends don't let friends discuss already out-discussed topics on RCSE. This belongs with down-wind turns, counter-clockwise thermals, etc. Anker But dynamic soaring is downwind turns. Don't discuss that either? :-) Chuck Anderson RCSE-List facilities pr

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Anker Berg-Sonne
Friends don't let friends discuss already out-discussed topics on RCSE. This belongs with down-wind turns, counter-clockwise thermals, etc. Anker RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Cal Posthuma
ED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 1:47 PM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter Friends don't let friends fly 2M. Anyway, if you want classes that require real skill, I look forward to you entering F3b at next years Nats. I know Chuck won't be

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Justin Ammon
sday, June 29, 2005 10:47 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter Friends don't let friends fly 2M. Anyway, if you want classes that require real skill, I look forward to you entering F3b at next years Nats. I know Chuck won't be at any of those F..

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Michael Lachowski
Friends don't let friends fly 2M. Anyway, if you want classes that require real skill, I look forward to you entering F3b at next years Nats. I know Chuck won't be at any of those F.. class events. ;-) RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe"

Re: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread James V. Bacus
ck as well. See Ya, Pat (wishing I was going to the Nats) McCleave > > From: "James V. Bacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/06/29 Wed AM 11:58:58 EDT > To: soaring@airage.com > Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter > > > He is

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Justin Ammon
m Illinois. Justin (btw, the res thing is a joke) - Original Message - From: "James V. Bacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:58 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter > He is entered and flying in it, are you? I g

Re: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Pat McCleave
Wed AM 11:58:58 EDT > To: soaring@airage.com > Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter > > > He is entered and flying in it, are you? > > I guess you are entered for 2005, I don't see your name in the scores from > 2004... I guess we will see you dem

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Justin Ammon
Everything but NOS...It's real easy to check. http://www.silentflight.org/NATS2005/Register.html Justin Ammon - Original Message - From: "James V. Bacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Deat

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread James V. Bacus
> He is entered and flying in it, are you? I guess you are entered for 2005, I don't see your name in the scores from 2004... I guess we will see you demonstrate your 2m skills in Muncie in a few weeks, I can't wait. 8-) At 10:18 AM 6/29/2005, Justin Ammon wrote: Yup, I agree! We should g

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Justin Ammon
I know that Chuck. :^) But many will disagree. Justin - Original Message - From: "Chuck Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:51 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter At 10:18 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote: Yup, I a

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread James V. Bacus
He is entered and flying in it, are you? At 10:18 AM 6/29/2005, Justin Ammon wrote: Yup, I agree! We should get rid of all classes that might take some real talent and skill to fly well in. Justin - Original Message - From: "Jack Strother" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steve Meyer" <[E

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Chuck Anderson
At 10:18 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote: Yup, I agree! We should get rid of all classes that might take some real talent and skill to fly well in. Justin 2-meter doesn't take any more talent than unlimited or standard class. Just better vision. Chuck Anderson RCSE-List facilities provided by

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Justin Ammon
Yup, I agree! We should get rid of all classes that might take some real talent and skill to fly well in. Justin - Original Message - From: "Jack Strother" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steve Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 4:16 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Ent