[RCSE] New Receiver Standard

2001-01-10 Thread Bill Swingle
Thanks to Tom Hoopes for relating his test results. Empirical data is the best and we owe Tom our gratitude for his efforts. The marketing trends of today don't include the hard core factual data. And, I'm not expecting to see this change. Thus, it's difficult to separate truth from lies (oops,

RE: [RCSE] New Receiver Standard

2001-01-10 Thread Barry Baskin
I agree with Bill. I would not be able to fly many of the planes I do without Tom's amazing skills on programming the Stylus Tx. His seal of approval on Rx's would be meaningful to memore power to Tom, helps us consumers. Barry Baskin. Walnut Creek CA. RCSE-List facilities provided by Model

Re: [RCSE] New Receiver Standard

2001-01-10 Thread tony estep
Well, at the very least we should band together and do the following: ask all the mfrs to release and swear to their specs for bandwidth at -6 and -60 db, sensitivity for 10 db s/(s+n), current drain, low voltage limit (and maybe more that others more savvy than I might propose). Maybe we could