, there are structural loading advantages to having
the weight distributed in the wing.
Bill DelHagen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: D Hauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] ballast ? wing/fuse
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:31:25 -0700
hi all,
you guys where so good on my
*
-Original Message-
From: Jim Laurel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2005 3:45 PM
To: D Hauch
Cc: soaring@airage.com
Subject: Re: [RCSE] ballast ? wing/fuse
I just don't understand the concept of wing ballast. It would seem
to me that it assumes a particular CG, right
: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:31:37 +1000
To: Jim Laurel [EMAIL PROTECTED], D Hauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: soaring@airage.com
Subject: RE: [RCSE] ballast ? wing/fuse
Hi Jim,
If you do the calculations, or a practical test, you will see that a minor
error in placement of the ballast has
hi all,
you guys where so good on my last question i have another
for you guys.
some planes take ballast in the fuse and others in the wing.
is there any penalties you pay in performance say for a wing
that is fully ballast, compared to a fuse full.
i'm talking 2lb. to 4lb. of ballast, so the
-
From: D Hauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 11:31 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] ballast ? wing/fuse
hi all,
you guys where so good on my last question i have another
for you guys.
some planes take ballast in the fuse and others in the wing.
is there any
] ballast ? wing/fuse
hi all,
you guys where so good on my last question i have another
for you guys.
some planes take ballast in the fuse and others in the wing.
is there any penalties you pay in performance say for a wing
that is fully ballast, compared to a fuse full.
i'm talking 2lb
I just don't understand the concept of wing ballast. It would seem
to me that it assumes a particular CG, right? If the ballast in the
wing isn't right on the CG, doesn't it mean that the cg actually
changes depending on how much ballast is put in there? Seems a
dubious solution to me.
7 matches
Mail list logo
