those wanting synth capabilities
perhaps.
JD
-Original Message-
From: Simon Van Leeuwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:26 AM
To: John Derstine
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Dave Register'; soaring@airage.com;
'Gordy
Stahl'; 'Barry Kennedy'
Sub
Register'; soaring@airage.com;
'Gordy
> Stahl'; 'Barry Kennedy'
> Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - Shadow 3
>
> No "hopes" required John...rigorous range testing will show whether
> there is any shortcomings when operating multiple RX's. I
soaring.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Simon Van Leeuwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 6:20 PM
To: John Derstine
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Dave Register'; soaring@airage.com;
'Gordy
Stahl'; 'Barry Kennedy'
Subject:
Do-able Chuck, but the black plastic cases use what is called carbon
black to create the color "black". This, in itself, is somewhat of a shield.
The OEM's never anticipated the idea of running more than one RX, hence
I'm sure do not see the need, nor the expense of considering such a
case. Cos
ing@airage.com;
'Gordy
> Stahl'; 'Barry Kennedy'
> Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - Shadow 3
>
> The problem on dual RX setups is not the antennas, but co-interference
> between the IF's within each of the RX's. This is what reduces
> sens
At 05:19 PM 3/25/2005, you wrote:
The problem on dual RX setups is not the antennas, but co-interference
between the IF's within each of the RX's. This is what reduces
sensitivity. This problem is solved easily by shielding one or both RX's.
The shielding can be as simple as a 6" x 6" conductive
he other performance data. The stuff that keeps your plane in the air.
JD
-Original Message-
From: George Gillburg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 2:49 PM
To: John Derstine
Cc: 'Dave Register'; soaring@airage.com; 'Gordy Stahl'; 'Barry Ken
: John Derstine
Cc: 'Dave Register';
soaring@airage.com; 'Gordy Stahl'; 'Barry Kennedy'
Subject: RE: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1
#5375 - Shadow 3
> Gee, that is almost as good as a JR 10x with a standard PCM rx
Yes, but
is the JR standard PCM rx synthesized? Does
You must not fly DLG. :) An 8 gram synth rx that behaves well
is worth it's (low) weight in gold. My Shadow 3 should be arriving
any time now. I'm looking forward to trying it out with my new 9C synth
module. Should be a good combination.
..
brian r.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday, March 25,
> Gee, that is almost as good as a JR 10x with a standard PCM
rx Yes, but is the JR standard PCM rx synthesized? Does it
weigh 8 gms? Somehow, I doubt it.George Gillburg Bakersfield, California
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to
Gee, that is almost as good as a JR 10x with a standard PCM rx
JD
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Register [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 2:17 PM
> To: Soaring@airage.com; Gordy Stahl; Barry Kennedy
> Subject: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - Shadow 3
>
> Not
11 matches
Mail list logo
