Re: [Soekris] RAID1

2011-04-07 Thread Matt Ryanczak
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > in the field with both geom and md. a better protection in the case of a > device like the soekris (and where you're trying to protect the contents > of primary storage. would be to put the boot directory/code on a small > flash and raid the p

[Soekris] Problem with DP8381 and crash system

2011-04-07 Thread Asistar srl Ivan Bolognani
I have a big problem with the driver natsemi in eth4 and eth5 The eht4 and 5 is running for 3- 4 day and after the system is crash. In dmesg i find before the crash system this line eth4: increased tx threshold, txcfg 0xd0f01004. eth5: increased tx threshold, txcfg 0xd0f01006. After 2 ­3 hours

Re: [Soekris] RAID1

2011-04-07 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
You might take a look at: http://www.arcoide.com/ They have been doing hardware mirroring solutions for [S|P]ATA and USB for several years, and may be able to offer what you want. You only need one SATA connection to one of their devices to mirror two SATA drives. The only question I would have

Re: [Soekris] RAID1

2011-04-07 Thread Francesco Trentini
>> [...] possibility of the inclusion of a simple RAID1 chip [...] Well, not everybody runs Linux.One of the few advantages of firmware (rarely actually hardware, though for RAID1-only that's relatively plausible) RAID is that it is - or at least can be if done right - completely transparent

Re: [Soekris] RAID1

2011-04-07 Thread Ralph Becker-Szendy
Francesco Trentini wrote: > Due to the imminent new board 6501, and the presence of two SATA > interfaces, this will surely be a very welcomed addition allowing to > create a simple mirrored bootable array of two disks. I don't see a great need for this. RAID1 (and btw. RAID0, a.k.a. striping) a