Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-19 Thread Jan Mikkelsen
Chris Babcock wrote: > Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: >> I'm just trying to see if there are viable >> alternatives that are in the Soekris class. There are solutions >> like : >> >> http://www.plees.f2s.com/ec/mini-svr/mini-svr.htm >> >> but I can't see it being cost effective/supported/etc.

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-17 Thread Jochen Grotepass
Well, maybe a bit dangerous but running a Windows Platform on a "headless" - non-graphic - Board is not a good idea. Maybe this one here is a better solution for a Win98 system (even if I don't like this os ;-) http://www.pcengines.ch/alix1c.htm Please don't get me wrong. This board is more a "

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread RB
> While I agree with the speed sentiment, Vmware *doesn't* require a special > processor. Xen does, and I think qemu does as well... Beat me to it, but not quite correct - neither Xen nor qemu require said support, qemu can even be completely userspace (yes, there is a kqemu accelerator that isn

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread RB
> would be painfully slow. Virtual machine hypervisors > like VMware require processors that support virtualization. I'm not really interested in joining the debate (other than I think virtualization is probably the wrong direction), but had to respond to this comment. Absolutely untrue - for a

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Steve Holdoway
While I agree with the speed sentiment, Vmware *doesn't* require a special processor. Xen does, and I think qemu does as well... Steve On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:59:17 -0700 Sean McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > x86 emulation to run a software virtual machine > would be painfully slow. Virtual

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Sean McGrath
x86 emulation to run a software virtual machine would be painfully slow. Virtual machine hypervisors like VMware require processors that support virtualization. I don't think any Soekris board has the required CPU. -- Sean McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] Florian Klemenz wrote: > Hi, > > Sunday, March

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Florian Klemenz
Hi, Sunday, March 16, 2008, 14:00, you wrote: > Do you think a 55XX would have enough horsepower > to run something like FreeBSD with VMWare on top of it > with Win98? The machine is only used for access in and out > of the Fire Station. Having it crash during a fire is a bad > thing. Th

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Joel Jaeggli
This application is better suited (legacy windows software) to a older-segin mini-itx system... if you were working on a wholesale replacement for this particular application a modern embedded system might be more appropiate and no I wouldn't run vmware on a soekris. That's headed the wrong

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Trevor Talbot
On Mar 16, 2008, at 1:20 PM, Greg Shenaut wrote: >> they need to run Windows 98 on it for their door security system. > > Is that really true? I think I'd start by trying to find out more > about this system and their needs. It could be that a Soekris box is > way overkill, or it could be that t

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Chris Babcock
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > I'm just trying to see if there are viable > alternatives that are in the Soekris class. There are solutions > like : > > http://www.plees.f2s.com/ec/mini-svr/mini-svr.htm > > but I can't see it being cost effective/supported/etc. > > I came to the

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Greg Shenaut
> they need to run Windows 98 on it for their door security system. Is that really true? I think I'd start by trying to find out more about this system and their needs. It could be that a Soekris box is way overkill, or it could be that they (and their insurance company) would be happier wit

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> > > > Hi, > > > > Over the last few months I've talked to a local PC tech > > about the Soekris line. Well, he just went and pitched it and > > was accepted at the local fire department. That'd be great, > > except they need to run Windows 98 on it for their door > > security system. >

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Jonathon Exley
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET > Sent: Monday, 17 March 2008 2:01 a.m. > To: soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com > Subject: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative? > > Hi, > >

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Jan Hoevers
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote on 16-3-2008 14:00: > Hi, > > Over the last few months I've talked to a local > PC tech about the Soekris line. Well, he just went and pitched > it and was accepted at the local fire department. That'd be > great, except they need to run Windows 98 on it for their >

Re: [Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Arnt Gulbrandsen
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET writes: > I've never seen anything about running Windows on any of the Soekris > devices. (Maybe just because running Windows in and of itself is in > general "A bad idea". :) ) Can you run Windows (except Wince) on a device without a graphics card? Arnt _

[Soekris] Any suggestion for alternative?

2008-03-16 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi, Over the last few months I've talked to a local PC tech about the Soekris line. Well, he just went and pitched it and was accepted at the local fire department. That'd be great, except they need to run Windows 98 on it for their door security system. I've never seen anything