Ralph Becker-Szendy wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Igor Sobrado wrote:
>
> All this is true, for the temperature ranges they studied.
>
>> So, temperature is not a source of disk failures.
>
> WRONG! For the disks that were mounted in google's data center, there
> was no clear correlation between
On 4 Feb 2008, at 10:35, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> 0n Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:32:55PM -0800, Ralph Becker-Szendy
> wrote:
>
>> If you are interested in this topic: FAST (the file system and
>> storage
>> conference, where the Google paper was presented) is coming up in San
>> Jose at the e
0n Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:32:55PM -0800, Ralph Becker-Szendy wrote:
>If you are interested in this topic: FAST (the file system and storage
>conference, where the Google paper was presented) is coming up in San
>Jose at the end of February. I'll be there. The program shows that
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Igor Sobrado wrote:
>> I have had 3 e7k100's fail with read errors in the same general
>> area of the disk.
>
> How odd! The only way to get symptoms like the one you describe
> is getting the surface temperature of the disk platters higher
> than the Curie point. It should n
