I'm using 1.12.4. It looks like that the re-INVITE doesn't get passed to
my na callback. How to enable the stack to pass the re-INVITE my
callback so I can change my RTP session?
Thanks!
Charles
send 285 bytes to udp/[10
Hello All,
Well, I modified my application from
nua_set_params(nua,
NUTAG_ALLOW_EVENTS("dialog;sla;include-session-description"), TAG_END());
to
nua_set_params(nua, NUTAG_ALLOW_EVENTS("dialog"), TAG_END());
nua_set_params(nua, NUTAG_ALLOW_EVENTS("sla"), TAG_END());
nua_set_params(n
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 15:39 +0200, Pekka Pessi wrote:
> 2007/10/30, Ge@@ru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > why on hash_resize macro (su/sofia-sip/htable.h) there isn't su_free of
> > old_hash? There is a su_zalloc call for allocate a new memory area but
> > then i don't see su_free of old data.
>
> Look
Additonally, is there a way to obtain the value of the branch parameter in
the Via header that sofia-sip set an outgoing NOTIFY message?
Best Regards,
Jerry
-Original Message-
From:
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 10:52 AM
To: 'sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Getting Ou
Hello All,
Is there a way for the application to obtain the value of the CSEQ field
that sofia-sip sends in an outgoing NOTIFY message? I need this in order to
distinguish multiple outgoing NOTIFY requests with multiple incoming 200
OKs.
Best Regards,
Jerry
2007/10/30, Massimo Cetra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi list,
>
> i'm trying to solve the broken natted-devices (mostly not using stun).
>
> When a sip client connects to my application (a new channel for
> callweaver) using it's internal private address, if i use
> NTATAG_SERVER_RPORT(1) , it allows m
2007/10/30, Ge@@ru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> why on hash_resize macro (su/sofia-sip/htable.h) there isn't su_free of
> old_hash? There is a su_zalloc call for allocate a new memory area but
> then i don't see su_free of old data.
Looks like a leak. I'll fix that and see if it breaks anything...
--
