On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Pekka Pessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it enough if you just set the initial RSeq?
Yes, that's pretty much what I need. Sorry for not being clearer before.
> The current nua code does not detect reliably sent preliminary
> responses from the presence of RSeq
2008/6/25 Fabio Margarido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've taken a stab at fixing the issues I reported earlier and have
> come up with a solution for one of them. The attached patches address
> the issue of not being able to use a user specified RSeq header when
> 1XX answers are sent reliably.
> I'm n
2008/6/25 Fabio Margarido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've taken a stab at fixing the issues I reported earlier and have
> come up with a solution for one of them. The attached patches address
> the issue of not being able to use a user specified RSeq header when
> 1XX answers are sent reliably.
> I'm n
I've taken a stab at fixing the issues I reported earlier and have
come up with a solution for one of them. The attached patches address
the issue of not being able to use a user specified RSeq header when
1XX answers are sent reliably.
I'm not sure this is the best way to solve this issue, so some
OK, I believe this has turned into a bug in the stack. I've noticed
some more details:
- When I send a 183 response with nua_respond() containing
SIPTAG_RSEQ() or SIPTAG_RSEQ_STR() the stack disregards my RSeq and
uses its own, and PRACK is treated correctly;
- When I send a 180 response in exactl
Sorry to double post, but I've given this some more reading, and now
I'm a bit afraid of the answer I'm likely to get to my original
question. I've found this in the documentation for nta:
"The nta takes care of assigning a serial number to each reliable
response and resending them if no PRACK req
Hi there,
I'm trying to set a manually generated RSeq header with
SIPTAG_RSEQ_STR() in nua_respond(), but 100rel 18X messages go out
with a stack generated RSeq anyway. PRACK is not among my
NUTAG_APPL_METHOD()s in this case. Is there something I'm missing or
is this behavior expected?
--
