Hi Fabricio,
No, it does not get regenerated. And I believe the point array starts from
index 0.
In 2012, it will return 0, 0, -1 #QNB for invalid point.
In 2013, we have corrected it to become 0,0,0.
Regards,
Chris Chia
Softimage QA Analyst
On 7 May, 2012, at 11:07 AM, "Fabricio Chamon" wr
That is the correct definition of a point index.
Locations, however, are not point indices. That said, I can't quite find in
this thread where the unavailability of indices is discussed, so I'm not
sure exactly what this is about.
I'm really just bored waiting for a cache.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1
Chris, thanks for taking a look at it.
Well, maybe I'm missing the concept of point index then.
Is it correct to assume a Point Index is an incremental value assigned to
points, and that there's no gaps between it's values?
example, a pointcloud with 5 particles has point indices 1,2,3,4 and 5.
i
3 matches
Mail list logo