On 08/17/15 3:08, Tim Leydecker wrote:
The entire modeling process shown, even in this early stage,
seemed very fluid, intuitive and desireable.
Like clay.
I agree and maybe the fact that it's mostly Maya that's getting
ne
bump.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Pierre Schiller <
activemotionpictu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi team. I know this has been posted a lot of times, but I was wondering
> if AD did ever fixed
> the issue with multilayered .exr images on a single file from MR? (mental
> ray).
>
> I know all othe
I think this is positive. Having a vision even if it's on broad tasks to me is
a big step forward. However once you start down this road it makes having
multiple apps more and more of an issue.
-Original Message-
From: Graham Bell [mailto:bell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 August 2015 11:11 AM
For those who did not have a chance to see the presentation yet:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x31z7u9_the-future-of-modeling_school
Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
--
Leendert A. Hartog AKA Hirazi Blue
Administrator NOT the owner of si-community.com
was never really a fan of that kais power tools look TBH
c.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Jason S wrote:
> BTW That site was years ahead of it's time! (when most sites looked like
> Yahoo front page)
> (and not unlike most of what came-out of Soft then and a long bit after
> then :) )
>
> A
So why did it "get pulled"?
Something deemed wrong with it after all?
:p
Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
--
Leendert A. Hartog AKA Hirazi Blue
Administrator NOT the owner of si-community.com
What are you talking about?
You are totally missing the point, this is not a beauty contest, we are
professionals discussing on a video about the history of modeling tools.
Here's a rant for you people. :)
-
I think people wants to be blind forever.
There's no war or anger around, is just facts. We all know that Autodesk is
a solid company but at the same time it's the industry joke.
I would applaud Autodesk development if i see something that's really n
So well it got pulled :x
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Tim Leydecker wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.08.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Graham Bell:
>
>> Ha, no, because there's no reference to an actual feature name, product
>> name (other than the intro) and release date. The video has been removed
>> now, but t
Am 17.08.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Graham Bell:
Ha, no, because there's no reference to an actual feature name, product name
(other than the intro) and release date. The video has been removed now, but
there probably was a safe harbour statement at the beginning which is usually
sufficient for t
Ha, no, because there's no reference to an actual feature name, product name
(other than the intro) and release date. The video has been removed now, but
there probably was a safe harbour statement at the beginning which is usually
sufficient for this type of thing. Anything deeper and you need
Isn't this " Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come" presentation stretching the
limits of (the side-effects of) the fabled "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"?
Greetz
Leendert
AKA Hirazi Blue
--
Leendert A. Hartog AKA Hirazi Blue
Administrator NOT the owner of si-community.com
That video gave some very thrilling insights and the presentation style
by Andrew was
very enjoyable, too.
The handling of self-intersections and fusing of surfaces into a unified
shell is really desireable,
especially if it doesn´t inflict a modification of the entire surface
topology but is
13 matches
Mail list logo
