I'm guessing that is highly dependent on the size of the studio as in my
experience the bigger the studio, you gain a substantial amount of time
for tools and RnD. Either that or some of us are just nerdy enough to go
home at night and continue to tinker and build things. :)
Certain projects I
Producers never will realize that spending a little extra up front will
save them a TON later. I've got a client I've worked with for 6 years &
I've tried to convince them of various ideas I've got on streamlining
things. In 6 years, they've never even considered it once.
Sadly deadlines are alm
It sounds reasonable to me, if a bit old-school. But there's nothing wrong
with old-school!
A more procedural approach might be to animate the connectors, perhaps as a
particle system, and then to extrude strand trails behind them as the
cords. The nice thing about this kind of approach is that it
*
>
> represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Griswold
> *Sent:* Monday, April 22, 2013 1:30 PM
> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
hor and do not
represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Paul Griswold
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:30 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Did I over-complicate this?
I wan
I wanted to ask for your collective wisdom on this.
I have a project where I'm animating around 30 different cables. Some are
USB, some Firewire, and so on. Initially for the storyboards I use
PowerExtrude to lay out all the designs, but now I need to fly the cables
down my curves.
If I didn't
6 matches
Mail list logo
