just as a shell basically with their own customization and updating, so could
one of the larger houses using soft not do the same thing?
...
Long term, that's roughly my thinking with using Fabric Engine for in house
development. It puts that very idea within reach of smaller places.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Andi Farhall hack...@outlook.com wrote:
just as a shell basically with their own customization and updating, so
What's the risk of Soft 2015 ceasing to work with future versions of
operating systems and hardware?
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Jonah Friedman jon...@gmail.com wrote:
Long term, that's roughly my thinking with using Fabric Engine for in
house development. It puts that very idea within
there's a vast difference between building upon an old, supported
architecture and a soon to be obsolete and desolate one.
besides, are you really going to base your pipeline on the goodwill of
AD ?
--
Jon Swindells
jon_swinde...@fastmail.fm
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014, at 05:24 PM, Arvid Björn
I'd say pretty likely after two or three versions of Windows.
Not to mention when it happens you'll be stuck with whatever version and
Microsoft doesn't support them anymore. It usually ceases support about ten
years after each release, after which you no longer get security updates
and if you're
Oh and let's not even talk about modern Linux support... You need to
sacrifice a chicken and chant some unholy spell to get Softimage working in
Ubuntu.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Alan Fregtman alan.fregt...@gmail.comwrote:
I'd say pretty likely after two or three versions of Windows.
running fine in mint16 (ubuntu 13.10 based i think), no sacrificial
poultry needed.
running unity by any chance ?
--
Jon Swindells
jon_swinde...@fastmail.fm
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014, at 05:59 PM, Alan Fregtman wrote:
Oh and let's not even talk about modern Linux support... You need to
That's a good point, though then years is quite a lot of time and should even
allow the largest company with lots of backlog to transition gracefully to
whatever is hot and sexy then. Meanwhile, how about using a virtual machine of
XP in a more modern version of windows along with your other
it's the mainwin/linux side of things that I worry about.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Alan Fregtman alan.fregt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd say pretty likely after two or three versions of Windows.
Not to mention when it happens you'll be stuck with whatever version and
Microsoft doesn't
Equally fine on centos 6.5 under kde (or gnome).
Original message
From: Jon Swindells jon_swinde...@fastmail.fm
Date:03/07/2014 11:03 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Just a thought - I hear the framestore use an ancient version of
I'd say you're safe within 3+ versions of windows, ran SI3D on Win7
some time ago, booted in a second lol.
On 03/07/14 10:24, Arvid Björn wrote:
What's the risk of Soft 2015 ceasing to work with future versions of
operating systems and hardware?
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Jonah
I'd say you're safe within 3+ version of windows, ran SI3D on Win7 some
time ago, booted in a second lol.
On 03/07/14 10:24, Arvid Björn wrote:
What's the risk of Soft 2015 ceasing to work with future versions of
operating systems and hardware?
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Jonah
12 matches
Mail list logo
