: Sunday, July 14, 2013 9:19 PM
To: Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
Cc: Softwires
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Comments on draft-ietf-softwire-map-deployment-01
Dear Roberta,
The DS-Lite ATFR Name option defined in RFC 6334 is used to carry a fully
qualified domain name of the AFTR not an IPv6 address.
There was
Hi Roberta,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Roberta Maglione (robmgl) wrote:
>
> In addition even if you could, it would sound confusing in my opinion,
> using a DS-Lite specific option to provision MAP specific parameters.
>
[Qiong] I agree with you. I think using DMR is more clear.
Best wi
Dear Qi,
Thanks for your detailed review. I have incorporated most of your comments
into the next version and will be submitted soon.
Some comments are inline.
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Qi Sun wrote:
>
> 2. Currently, there is no DMR in MAP-E. The IPv6 address of the BR could
> be pro
t would sound confusing in my opinion, using
> a DS-Lite specific option to provision MAP specific parameters.
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> Roberta
>
> From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Qi Sun
> S
ubject: Re: [Softwires] Comments on draft-ietf-softwire-map-deployment-01
Dear wg,
I've reviewed the draft and have some comments in addition to Tom's. May the
comments make the draft better.
Please correct me if there is any mistake.
Best Regards,
Qi
1. In Fig 1, there is an element
Dear wg,
I've reviewed the draft and have some comments in addition to Tom's. May the
comments make the draft better.
Please correct me if there is any mistake.
Best Regards,
Qi
1. In Fig 1, there is an element called the Core Router. Does it mean MAP BR? I
think the terms should be consist
dear Tom,
thanks a lot for the comments. sorry for the delay though.
now maoke is replying in line regarding the section 5.
2013/5/16 Tom Taylor
> I have a number of trivial editorial comments, which I will share
> privately with the authors. However, I also have a few points for broader
> rev
Dear Tom,
Sorry for late reply due to the instability of my mail account recently.
Thanks a lot for your detailed comments! We will modify it accordingly.
My comments for section 4 is inline below. Maoke will give his comments on
section 5 in a separated mail.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:11 AM, T
I have a number of trivial editorial comments, which I will share
privately with the authors. However, I also have a few points for
broader review.
Section 4.1, Figure 3
=
The introductory text to this figure reads:
"Figure 3 illustrate a typical case,
where the home
