On 8/22/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...So you would say "LowerCaseFilter" instead of "LowerCaseFilterFactory"...
I like the idea, as long as it's made sufficiently transparent.
For example by logging a warning when a Factory is not found and the
component is created by reflect
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-43?page=comments#action_12429863 ]
Mike Klaas commented on SOLR-43:
Looks good! I especially like how trivial it is to create arbitrarily-nested
parameter chains. One thing I believe that was lost in
> Do you mean lazy loading of fields?
Yes.
- Original Message
From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 5:23:48 PM
Subject: Re: Tackling Solr Fieldable
On 8/22/06, jason rutherglen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this being wo
On 8/22/06, jason rutherglen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this being worked on? Otherwise I'll do it.
Could you be more explicit... do you mean starting to use Fieldable
instead of Field due to the introduction of Lucene's Fieldable (which
Field subclasses)? Do you mean lazy loading of field
Is this being worked on? Otherwise I'll do it.
On 8/22/06, Anonymous (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-43?page=all ]
Attachment: solrparams.patch
Anonymous, huh? I would have figured one would need to be logged in
to attach something...
Anyway, for the record, it was me :-)
-Yonik
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-43?page=comments#action_12429821 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-43:
--
Attached refresh.
Unless someone thinks this is going off in the wrong direction, I'll commit
this soon so others can work on it
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-43?page=all ]
Attachment: solrparams.patch
> query parameter overhaul
>
>
> Key: SOLR-43
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-43
> Project: Solr
> Issue
On 8/22/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do people thing of leaving off "Factory" from tokenizers and
token filters in schema.xml.
Let the user say what filter they want, not necessarily how to get it.
So you would say "LowerCaseFilter" instead of "LowerCaseFilterFactory".
Imple
What do people thing of leaving off "Factory" from tokenizers and
token filters in schema.xml.
Let the user say what filter they want, not necessarily how to get it.
So you would say "LowerCaseFilter" instead of "LowerCaseFilterFactory".
Implementation details:
- Specification of a Factory woul
On 8/21/06, Norman Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...3) Can you use a JDBC datastore which is shared amonst a cluster...
FWIW, the Compass project [1] apparently has got a module to store
Lucene indexes in a JDBC database. If this can work with Solr (I have
no idea, you'll have to look at i
11 matches
Mail list logo
