[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-152:
---
Attachment: SOLR-152-DismaxNoQ.patch
using the matchall parameter
> Dismax should not require 'q'
> --
: Are we using DecimalFormat class somewhere?
I had to check, when using the XML output at least, a simple
Double.toString(val) is used...
: 1.1E7
:
: I post (ASCII string) value 1.2E7 via XML POST, of course SOLR should return
: 1.2E7; I'll try to post 1199.99, let's see... Field is
what you describe sounds almost like a new type of query that rewrites
itself according to your custom rules (Query.rewrite takes in an
INdexReader for this type of purpose) along with a customization of
SolrQueryParser so you can look for your special field and use your custom
query class in that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471624
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-109:
---
Thorsten: i finally got a chance to look at this, but i'm not seeing how it
achieves wh
On Feb 3, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I'd like to be able to have a common schema.xml and solrconfig.xml
but be able to fire up Solr instances pointed to different data
directories. I realize we have SOLR-79 in JIRA. Is that the
approach we want long term?
Here's an off-the-cu
Because of the interest I'm seeing in solrb (would renaming it sol.rb
be bad?) and Flare, I see a need for us Rubyists to have our own
list. We've had ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org for a while now, but it
is a ghost town. Let's revive it and use that list for sol.rb and
Flare discussions fro
Sounds like a fine idea to me!
-Yonik
On 2/9/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because of the interest I'm seeing in solrb (would renaming it sol.rb
be bad?) and Flare, I see a need for us Rubyists to have our own
list. We've had ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org for a while now, but it
is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471770
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-152:
---
i haven't looked at the latest patch yet, but it occured to me on the train
this mornin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471775
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-152:
---
Or perhaps annotating the q parameter to avoid the explosion of parameters?
q=*
On 2/9/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...We've had ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org for a while now, but it
is a ghost town. Let's revive it and use that list for sol.rb and
Flare discussions from now on...
+1, good idea!
- Bertrand, trying hard to keep up with Solr java stuff already
Added package tasks for creating Rails plugin and namespaced both the rails and
gem packaging
-
Key: SOLR-154
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-154
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471810
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-152:
---
>> q=*:*
one of the major focuses of dismax is to take the hassle out of front end
c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jamie Orchard-Hays updated SOLR-154:
Attachment: Rakefile.diff
Diff of current Rakefile with my changes.
> Added package tasks fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jamie Orchard-Hays updated SOLR-154:
Description:
Solrb's (sol.rb's?) rake file has a package:vendor task that is not generating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471814
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-152:
---
> an approach like this would require that the client notice when no query is
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471815
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-152:
---
>> at a broader level: annotating the "q" doesn't really address the issue of
>> lettin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471818
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-154:
---
I've committed this patch, but Jamie is up to a few more tweaks, so I'll close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jamie Orchard-Hays updated SOLR-154:
Attachment: Rakefile_2.diff
I've removed the old package:vendor task and replaced it with
ra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471846
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-152:
---
whoops ... looks like comment collision ... yeah, i'm thinking altq would be in
"solr s
: My use case is this: I want to have a single solrconfig.xml/
: schema.xml and Solr distribution, and be able to bring up a Solr
: instance for different data directories. Nothing more than that.
: For different configurations and schemas, I'd make a copy of the
: configuration directory.
:
: D
Field contents not escaped when using libxml-ruby
-
Key: SOLR-155
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-155
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: clients - ruby - flare
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Coda Hale updated SOLR-155:
---
Attachment: solrb_xml_escaping_fix.diff
Here's a failing unit test and a fix for the problem. Sorry! My bad.
>
: : Does this patch make sense to commit as-is, or could it be committed
: : with some tweaks, or is it not a good general approach and needs to
: : be thought out more?
:
: I suppose it's okay...
just to clarify that statement: i have no strong objection to it being
committed, as long as Erik ag
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-79?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher reassigned SOLR-79:
Assignee: Erik Hatcher
> [PATCH] Using system properties in Solr configuration
> -
On Feb 9, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: : Does this patch make sense to commit as-is, or could it be
committed
: : with some tweaks, or is it not a good general approach and
needs to
: : be thought out more?
:
: I suppose it's okay...
just to clarify that statement: i have no
25 matches
Mail list logo