[jira] Updated: (SOLR-152) Dismax should not require 'q'

2007-02-09 Thread Ryan McKinley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-152: --- Attachment: SOLR-152-DismaxNoQ.patch using the matchall parameter > Dismax should not require 'q' > --

RE: Float Values shown as 1.2E7

2007-02-09 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Are we using DecimalFormat class somewhere? I had to check, when using the XML output at least, a simple Double.toString(val) is used... : 1.1E7 : : I post (ASCII string) value 1.2E7 via XML POST, of course SOLR should return : 1.2E7; I'll try to post 1199.99, let's see... Field is

Re: Where to put in custom query rewriter?

2007-02-09 Thread Chris Hostetter
what you describe sounds almost like a new type of query that rewrites itself according to your custom rules (Query.rewrite takes in an INdexReader for this type of purpose) along with a customization of SolrQueryParser so you can look for your special field and use your custom query class in that

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-109) variable substitution in lucene query params

2007-02-09 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471624 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-109: --- Thorsten: i finally got a chance to look at this, but i'm not seeing how it achieves wh

Re: finer granularity of configuration

2007-02-09 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Feb 3, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: I'd like to be able to have a common schema.xml and solrconfig.xml but be able to fire up Solr instances pointed to different data directories. I realize we have SOLR-79 in JIRA. Is that the approach we want long term? Here's an off-the-cu

excommunicating Ruby

2007-02-09 Thread Erik Hatcher
Because of the interest I'm seeing in solrb (would renaming it sol.rb be bad?) and Flare, I see a need for us Rubyists to have our own list. We've had ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org for a while now, but it is a ghost town. Let's revive it and use that list for sol.rb and Flare discussions fro

Re: excommunicating Ruby

2007-02-09 Thread Yonik Seeley
Sounds like a fine idea to me! -Yonik On 2/9/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Because of the interest I'm seeing in solrb (would renaming it sol.rb be bad?) and Flare, I see a need for us Rubyists to have our own list. We've had ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org for a while now, but it is a

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-152) Dismax should not require 'q'

2007-02-09 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471770 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-152: --- i haven't looked at the latest patch yet, but it occured to me on the train this mornin

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-152) Dismax should not require 'q'

2007-02-09 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471775 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-152: --- Or perhaps annotating the q parameter to avoid the explosion of parameters? q=*

Re: excommunicating Ruby

2007-02-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 2/9/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...We've had ruby-dev@lucene.apache.org for a while now, but it is a ghost town. Let's revive it and use that list for sol.rb and Flare discussions from now on... +1, good idea! - Bertrand, trying hard to keep up with Solr java stuff already

[jira] Created: (SOLR-154) Added package tasks for creating Rails plugin and namespaced both the rails and gem packaging

2007-02-09 Thread Jamie Orchard-Hays (JIRA)
Added package tasks for creating Rails plugin and namespaced both the rails and gem packaging - Key: SOLR-154 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-154

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-152) Dismax should not require 'q'

2007-02-09 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471810 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-152: --- >> q=*:* one of the major focuses of dismax is to take the hassle out of front end c

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-154) Added package tasks for creating Rails plugin and namespaced both the rails and gem packaging

2007-02-09 Thread Jamie Orchard-Hays (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jamie Orchard-Hays updated SOLR-154: Attachment: Rakefile.diff Diff of current Rakefile with my changes. > Added package tasks fo

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-154) Added package tasks for creating Rails plugin and namespaced both the rails and gem packaging

2007-02-09 Thread Jamie Orchard-Hays (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jamie Orchard-Hays updated SOLR-154: Description: Solrb's (sol.rb's?) rake file has a package:vendor task that is not generating

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-152) Dismax should not require 'q'

2007-02-09 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471814 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-152: --- > an approach like this would require that the client notice when no query is >

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-152) Dismax should not require 'q'

2007-02-09 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471815 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-152: --- >> at a broader level: annotating the "q" doesn't really address the issue of >> lettin

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-154) Added package tasks for creating Rails plugin and namespaced both the rails and gem packaging

2007-02-09 Thread Erik Hatcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471818 ] Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-154: --- I've committed this patch, but Jamie is up to a few more tweaks, so I'll close

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-154) Added package tasks for creating Rails plugin and namespaced both the rails and gem packaging

2007-02-09 Thread Jamie Orchard-Hays (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jamie Orchard-Hays updated SOLR-154: Attachment: Rakefile_2.diff I've removed the old package:vendor task and replaced it with ra

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-152) Dismax should not require 'q'

2007-02-09 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471846 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-152: --- whoops ... looks like comment collision ... yeah, i'm thinking altq would be in "solr s

Re: finer granularity of configuration

2007-02-09 Thread Chris Hostetter
: My use case is this: I want to have a single solrconfig.xml/ : schema.xml and Solr distribution, and be able to bring up a Solr : instance for different data directories. Nothing more than that. : For different configurations and schemas, I'd make a copy of the : configuration directory. : : D

[jira] Created: (SOLR-155) Field contents not escaped when using libxml-ruby

2007-02-09 Thread Coda Hale (JIRA)
Field contents not escaped when using libxml-ruby - Key: SOLR-155 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-155 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Components: clients - ruby - flare

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-155) Field contents not escaped when using libxml-ruby

2007-02-09 Thread Coda Hale (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Coda Hale updated SOLR-155: --- Attachment: solrb_xml_escaping_fix.diff Here's a failing unit test and a fix for the problem. Sorry! My bad. >

Re: finer granularity of configuration

2007-02-09 Thread Chris Hostetter
: : Does this patch make sense to commit as-is, or could it be committed : : with some tweaks, or is it not a good general approach and needs to : : be thought out more? : : I suppose it's okay... just to clarify that statement: i have no strong objection to it being committed, as long as Erik ag

[jira] Assigned: (SOLR-79) [PATCH] Using system properties in Solr configuration

2007-02-09 Thread Erik Hatcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-79?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erik Hatcher reassigned SOLR-79: Assignee: Erik Hatcher > [PATCH] Using system properties in Solr configuration > -

Re: finer granularity of configuration

2007-02-09 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Feb 9, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : : Does this patch make sense to commit as-is, or could it be committed : : with some tweaks, or is it not a good general approach and needs to : : be thought out more? : : I suppose it's okay... just to clarify that statement: i have no