[jira] Updated: (SOLR-540) Add support for hl.fl=*

2008-06-30 Thread Lars Kotthoff (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-540: --- Attachment: SOLR-540-highlight-all.patch I've changed a couple of things and uploaded the new patch. *

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-540) Add support for hl.fl=*

2008-06-30 Thread Lars Kotthoff (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-540: --- Attachment: (was: solr-highlight-all.patch) > Add support for hl.fl=* > --- > >

[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-584) XSL for stats.jsp ignores

2008-06-30 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man resolved SOLR-584. --- Resolution: Fixed [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lucene/solr$ svn commit -m "SOLR-584: make stats.jsp and stats.xsl more

Re: Does SOLR-587 (Use Lucene's deleteByQuery) Mean that DUH2's DeleteByQuery Is Now Fast?

2008-06-30 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Chris Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages) explains that > "delete by id is much more efficient than delete by query". Does this > patch mean this is no longer true? Pretty much. > That is, is delete by query

Does SOLR-587 (Use Lucene's deleteByQuery) Mean that DUH2's DeleteByQuery Is Now Fast?

2008-06-30 Thread Chris Harris
The wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages) explains that "delete by id is much more efficient than delete by query". Does this patch mean this is no longer true? That is, is delete by query now basically as fast as delete by ID? If not, is there at least an amazing speedup for delete

Re: Extending Field and FieldType properties

2008-06-30 Thread Erik Hatcher
Further on this if metadata is added to a field type, it needs to somehow make it down to the tokenizer and filter factories to use if desired. Language, for example, could be attached to a field type, but then could be leveraged by a stop word filter to pick up a language-specific sto

Re: Extending Field and FieldType properties

2008-06-30 Thread J.J. Larrea
I heartily agree with you Grant that these objects should be user-extensible. But removing the exception test entirely would probably be a great disservice to Solr users, who could spend untold hours debugging problems in schema.xml (eg. misspelled or contextually inappropriate properties) witho

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-609) SpellCheckComponent doesn't read default options from solrconfig.xml

2008-06-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12609314#action_12609314 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-609: -- OK, I committed this, give it a try. > SpellChe

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-609) SpellCheckComponent doesn't read default options from solrconfig.xml

2008-06-30 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12609312#action_12609312 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-609: bq. Yeah, this probably makes sense.

[jira] Reopened: (SOLR-609) SpellCheckComponent doesn't read default options from solrconfig.xml

2008-06-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll reopened SOLR-609: -- Reopen, change to not use defaults, but to setup defaults on the ReqHandler > SpellCheckComponent do

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-609) SpellCheckComponent doesn't read default options from solrconfig.xml

2008-06-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12609300#action_12609300 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-609: -- {quote} Actually, now that I think about it, ano

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-14) Add the ability to preserve the original term when using WordDelimiterFilter

2008-06-30 Thread Geoffrey Young (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Geoffrey Young updated SOLR-14: --- Attachment: SOLR-14.patch this new patch addresses three additional cases o words prefixed with delim

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-483) short/byte sorting support

2008-06-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-483: - Attachment: SOLR-483.patch Will commit in a day or two. > short/byte sorting support > ---

Extending Field and FieldType properties

2008-06-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Currently, FieldType throws a RuntimeException if there are any "extra" properties in the configuration. I think SchemaField does something similar. I'd like to consider not doing this. My main case is I want to be able to store semantic information about the FieldType with the FieldTyp

[jira] Assigned: (SOLR-483) short/byte sorting support

2008-06-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll reassigned SOLR-483: Assignee: Grant Ingersoll > short/byte sorting support > -- > >

[jira] Work started: (SOLR-483) short/byte sorting support

2008-06-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on SOLR-483 started by Grant Ingersoll. > short/byte sorting support > -- > > Key: SOLR-483 > URL: https://issu

[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-485) Deprecate SpellCheckRequestHandler replace with one that does query analysis and spell checks each token

2008-06-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-485. -- Resolution: Won't Fix See SOLR-572 for a better Spell checker > Deprecate SpellCheckRequestHandl

[jira] Created: (SOLR-613) When a commit fail due to an OutOfMemoryError it doesn't handle properly the error (the write.lock is not deleted anymore and the admin adds a new document on the update han

2008-06-30 Thread Daniel Alheiros (JIRA)
When a commit fail due to an OutOfMemoryError it doesn't handle properly the error (the write.lock is not deleted anymore and the admin adds a new document on the update handler for each batch you send). -