[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616349#action_12616349
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-650:
---
-1
this idea has been discussed before, and i'm still opposed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616350#action_12616350
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-650:
I agree with Hoss. Wouldn't your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616354#action_12616354
]
Lars Kotthoff commented on SOLR-650:
bq. ...among other things it breaks backwards
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616358#action_12616358
]
Lars Kotthoff commented on SOLR-632:
The Jetty issue has been resolved; the changes will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616399#action_12616399
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-139:
-
How about maintaining a separate index at store.index and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616399#action_12616399
]
noble.paul edited comment on SOLR-139 at 7/24/08 2:14 AM:
--
How about
I was wondering whether the following feature if added, will have some added
value to the SOLR framework
What is needed?A component that can return TF-IDF vector for any given
document in the SOLR index
Query : A Document Number / a query identifying a Document
Response : A Map of term vs.TF-IDF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616457#action_12616457
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-269:
I've read through most of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616458#action_12616458
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-614:
I think the current scope is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616467#action_12616467
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-139:
---
It's unclear to me how your suggestion, Paul, is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher updated SOLR-649:
--
Component/s: search
Fix Version/s: 1.3
Facet parameter definitions should use the defined
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher resolved SOLR-649.
---
Resolution: Fixed
committed. Thanks Lars!
Facet parameter definitions should use the defined
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616483#action_12616483
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
bq. Not trying to be critical but seems like this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616511#action_12616511
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-269:
-
bq.Many processors need to maintain state within a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616511#action_12616511
]
noble.paul edited comment on SOLR-269 at 7/24/08 9:00 AM:
--
bq.Many
+1
-Grant
On Jul 24, 2008, at 7:02 AM, Asharaf S wrote:
I was wondering whether the following feature if added, will have
some added
value to the SOLR framework
What is needed?A component that can return TF-IDF vector for any given
document in the SOLR index
Query : A Document Number / a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616520#action_12616520
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-269:
bq. If each processor were shared
We can make it a SearchComponent
let us have a jira issue
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-Grant
On Jul 24, 2008, at 7:02 AM, Asharaf S wrote:
I was wondering whether the following feature if added, will have some
added
value to the SOLR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616511#action_12616511
]
noble.paul edited comment on SOLR-269 at 7/24/08 9:29 AM:
--
bq.Many
+1
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Asharaf S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering whether the following feature if added, will have some
added
value to the SOLR framework
What is needed?A component that can return TF-IDF vector for any given
document in the SOLR index
Query : A
q.alt=*:* when used with dismaxQueryHandler HighlightComponent throws NPE
--
Key: SOLR-652
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-652
Project: Solr
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616544#action_12616544
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
I'm all for simplifying the API. If you guys want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-652:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.3
q.alt=*:* when used with dismaxQueryHandler HighlightComponent throws NPE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-652:
---
Attachment: SOLR-652-highlightError.patch
Here is a patch and test that checks the highlighting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616564#action_12616564
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-139:
There are many approaches to make this work -- i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616570#action_12616570
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-139:
---
Ryan, I know of course the index can get big because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-645.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.3
Assignee: Hoss Man
Committed revision 679490.
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616609#action_12616609
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-489:
bq. For that matter: solrJ wasn't in Solr 1.2 ...
remove overwrite command from solrj API
-
Key: SOLR-653
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: clients - java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-653:
---
Attachment: SOLR-653-remove-solrj-overwrite.patch
patch removes 'overwrite' from the api
remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley reassigned SOLR-653:
--
Assignee: Ryan McKinley
remove overwrite command from solrj API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616649#action_12616649
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
bq. But we do have SolrQueryRequest#getContext to
Modify the solrj SolrResponse API so responses can be dynamicaly constructed
and loaded.
Key: SOLR-654
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-654
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-654:
---
Attachment: SOLR-654-SolrResposneAPI.patch
This patch moves initialization logic to 'setResponse(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1261#action_1261
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-620:
check SOLR-654 for a way to construct a SolrResponse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616667#action_12616667
]
Fuad Efendi commented on SOLR-653:
--
Will it overwrite by default?
I need to update document
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616670#action_12616670
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-653:
using 'overwite=false' is a sure way to make a mess.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616725#action_12616725
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on SOLR-139:
It's possible to recover unstored fields, if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616728#action_12616728
]
Lars Kotthoff commented on SOLR-489:
bq. i'm not really sure about the new isOverwrite()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616729#action_12616729
]
Mike Klaas commented on SOLR-139:
-
[quote]David - storing all data in the search index can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-489:
---
Attachment: SOLR-489.patch
bq. javadoc generates a lot of warnings like this...
Attaching a new patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-247:
---
Attachment: SOLR-247.patch
Attaching new patch which applies to current TRUNK.
Allow facet.field=*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-650:
---
Attachment: SOLR-650.patch
Attaching new patch which applies cleanly to current TRUNK.
facet.field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff closed SOLR-528.
--
Given but undefined default search field in schema.xml causes cryptic error
message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff closed SOLR-592.
--
Handler components should use parameter constants instead of hardcoded strings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff closed SOLR-644.
--
Increase maximum POST size in example Jetty configuration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff closed SOLR-529.
--
NullPointerException for search query without field specification and no
default search field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff closed SOLR-596.
--
NoSuchElementException when setting facet.count=0
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff closed SOLR-610.
--
Add support for hl.maxAnalyzedChars=-1 to highlight the whole field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff closed SOLR-649.
--
Facet parameter definitions should use the defined constant instead of
hardcoding the facet prefix for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff closed SOLR-645.
--
Move facet tests into own class
---
Key: SOLR-645
Fix javadoc warnings
Key: SOLR-655
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-655
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 1.3
Reporter: Lars Kotthoff
Priority: Trivial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-655:
---
Attachment: SOLR-655.patch
Patch to fix the warnings.
Adds the compilation of solrj as a prerequisite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley reassigned SOLR-655:
--
Assignee: Ryan McKinley
Fix javadoc warnings
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley resolved SOLR-655.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.3
fixed in 679647.
Thanks Lars!
Fix javadoc warnings
FYI, I don't think we tend to Close issues. Typically we leave the
status as Resolved
not that it is a big deal
On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Lars Kotthoff (JIRA) wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff closed SOLR-655.
--
...and that's 13 minutes from creation to resolution. I'm mighty impressed :)
Fix javadoc warnings
:
: FYI, I don't think we tend to Close issues. Typically we leave the status
: as Resolved
:
: not that it is a big deal
yeah ... Lucene-Java sort of established a precident of leaving issues
RESOLVED until there was a formal release containing the fix (ie: once hte
Fix Version is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley resolved SOLR-654.
Resolution: Fixed
Modify the solrj SolrResponse API so responses can be dynamicaly constructed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616750#action_12616750
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-655:
some patches are easier then others ;)
Fix javadoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616762#action_12616762
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-139:
-
* If your index is really big most likely you may have a
61 matches
Mail list logo
