[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar reassigned SOLR-646:
--
Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
Configuration properties in multicore.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi reassigned SOLR-517:
---
Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
I'll verify this soon. If LUCENE-1355 solves this issue, I'll commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623950#action_12623950
]
Toby Cole commented on SOLR-711:
We've seen this problem with our dataset, we have around 10m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623976#action_12623976
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-517:
-
Hmmm. New lucene-highlighter-2.4-dev.jar solves
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623985#action_12623985
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-586:
--
Have a look at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623994#action_12623994
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-586:
Wow, this is great! Thanks Grant!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623997#action_12623997
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-586:
--
OK, I think we are in pretty good shape. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624056#action_12624056
]
shalinmangar edited comment on SOLR-646 at 8/20/08 10:20 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-646:
---
Attachment: SOLR-646.patch
Here's another attempt on this issue.
# Three types of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624056#action_12624056
]
shalinmangar edited comment on SOLR-646 at 8/20/08 10:21 AM:
Suppose you have a custom SearchComponent that wants to muck with the
response built prior? You can replace values in a NamedList, but you
can't remove them. Any reason we can't add this to NamedList?
/**
* Removes the name/value pair at the specified index.
* @return the value at
You can replace them, but it is not pretty. Also, the results are in at
least two places in the ResponseBuilder which seems a bit odd.
//replace the DocList in ResponseBuilder
DocList dl = new DocSlice(docs.offset(), kept, keepDocs, keepScores,
docs.matches(), docs.maxScore());
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624114#action_12624114
]
Henri Biestro commented on SOLR-646:
Not sure this is my place to comment since I'm no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624126#action_12624126
]
Wayne Graham commented on SOLR-697:
---
Lars,
I just tested my code against last night's
On Aug 20, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Suppose you have a custom SearchComponent that wants to muck with
the response built prior? You can replace values in a NamedList,
but you can't remove them. Any reason we can't add this to NamedList?
/**
* Removes the name/value pair
Next week looks doable. We're pretty close, it seems, if we can
resist the urge to add more issues in :-)
-Grant
On Aug 20, 2008, at 1:31 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I very much agree!
I even feel that SOLR-646 could go in as-is (basing this on Ryan's
useful summary of that issue's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624134#action_12624134
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-517:
-
The cause of the junit error is lack of
On Aug 20, 2008, at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Seems reasonable to have a remove function
Cool. Any objections to me committing that before the 1.3 release?
It brings up an interesting philosophical question - should a
SearchComponent even be allowed to muck with the response at all,
On Aug 20, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Aug 20, 2008, at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Seems reasonable to have a remove function
Cool. Any objections to me committing that before the 1.3 release?
Couldn't resist... committed with unit test.
Erik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Mokbel closed SOLR-709.
Resolution: Invalid
Assuming setSoTimeout will fix this, I am closing this. I incorrectly assumed
that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624237#action_12624237
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-646:
Henri -- You have been doing all the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12624244#action_12624244
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-646:
-
Henri - your indignation is understandable
We are in a
22 matches
Mail list logo
