[jira] Commented: (SOLR-794) ClientUtils.escapeQueryChars escapes chars a bit aggressive

2008-10-01 Thread Koji Sekiguchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12636077#action_12636077 ] Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-794: - I'll commit this in a few days if there is no

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-794) ClientUtils.escapeQueryChars escapes chars a bit aggressive

2008-10-01 Thread Ryan McKinley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12636084#action_12636084 ] Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-794: but this has one BIG functional change... since we

What is a Standard SearchComponent? (SOLR-680)

2008-10-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
SOLR-680 proposes to add StatsComponent to the set of standard search components. Initially, the SpellCheckComponent did this as well. At the time, I thought we shouldn't add them to the standard set, but clearly others think differently. So, I think we should have a discussion of the

Re: What is a Standard SearchComponent? (SOLR-680)

2008-10-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
One thought is that there isn't a standard set of components in the request handler pipeline, but that they are spelled out entirely explicitly in the request handler mapping. At that point we can simply put in everything and the kitchen sink into the _example_ solrconfig.xml and let

Fwd: read-only SolrCore?

2008-10-01 Thread Ryan McKinley
Something funny is going on with my mail... It seems everything I have sent is disappearing... hopefully this will make it. -- Forwarded message -- From: Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:21 PM Subject: read-only SolrCore? To:

Re: What is a Standard SearchComponent? (SOLR-680)

2008-10-01 Thread Ryan McKinley
The reason I thought StatsComponent is default while SpellCheck is not is that SpellChecking necessarily requires some configuration. Stats can be there without doing anything -- it is just the cost of checking if stats=true in the request. I suggest that we add *all* Components that are

Re: read-only SolrCore?

2008-10-01 Thread Ryan McKinley
It looks like we have access to the read only searcher, but never call it. From SolrCore.java: // gets a non-caching searcher public SolrIndexSearcher newSearcher(String name) throws IOException { return newSearcher(name, false); } This call was only used by the update handler to do

Re: read-only SolrCore?

2008-10-01 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like we have access to the read only searcher, but never call it. From SolrCore.java: // gets a non-caching searcher public SolrIndexSearcher newSearcher(String name) throws IOException { return

[jira] Created: (SOLR-796) remove unused SolrIndexSearcher from DUH2

2008-10-01 Thread Ryan McKinley (JIRA)
remove unused SolrIndexSearcher from DUH2 - Key: SOLR-796 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-796 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: update Reporter:

Re: What is a Standard SearchComponent? (SOLR-680)

2008-10-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Oct 1, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: I disagree with Erik that we should have people explicitly configure the components. Folks don't have to explicitly configure them, if they are just running with the example configuration - which is more likely than not. Oh, another thing

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-433) MultiCore and SpellChecker replication

2008-10-01 Thread Stephane Bailliez (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12636273#action_12636273 ] Stephane Bailliez commented on SOLR-433: Note that on the last patches, the grep to