the point is that the search will be done on committed docs and the
stored fields will show uncommitted data.how are we going to deal with
this mismatch?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
>
>> It would be useful to en
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/892/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741807#action_12741807
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1277:
---
Solr has up until 1.3 focused on query load a
SolrInputDocument cannot process dynamic fields
---
Key: SOLR-1357
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1357
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: clients - java
Additionally, I'd say, I think we in Solr land need to setup a Hudson
build that installs the Lucene jars nightly and runs our tests,
including performance tests and reports to solr-dev the results of any
problems, which can then be pushed to java-dev if needed. This way,
we have a forward
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741854#action_12741854
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1357:
--
for the bean
{code:java}
public class MyBean{
@Field(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741854#action_12741854
]
Noble Paul edited comment on SOLR-1357 at 8/11/09 6:27 AM:
---
for th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741867#action_12741867
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1277:
--
Grant, the shards entry is a little confusing
The same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741878#action_12741878
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1277:
---
bq. The same information is repeated in the n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741900#action_12741900
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1277:
--
bq.It's configured in Solr Config, so whichever core do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741910#action_12741910
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1357:
Well, I don't see a reason behind the proposed beha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741915#action_12741915
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1357:
My point is that when a user has already annotated
The ids would be stored in Solr, when a query is executed the
ids would be looked up from the DocumentService interface which
underneath would obtain the document data (aka stored fields).
Solr would then return the results combining the two, and
present the stored fields as it does today.
For upd
Integration of Solr Cell and DataImportHandler
--
Key: SOLR-1358
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1358
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: contrib - DataImpor
I'm rejiggering my list subscriptions and checking to see if this
comes through.
Erik
(replying to solr-user thread over onto solr-dev)
: > last evening we started an optimize over our solr index of 45GB. This
morning
: > the optimize was still running, discs spinning like crazy and de index
: > directory has grew to 83GB.
:
: Hmmm, it was probably code to done given that 45*2=9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12742178#action_12742178
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1331:
Is the thinking here that we just expose SOLR-1051 type fun
> This is why we'd want to use optimistic concurrency, meaning
> versions of ids encoded in the documents (which would also be
> stored in the index ala GData).
So ,when the stored fields are fetched from the "DocumentService" the
version number also is sent?
As Grant mentioned , it would be nice
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12742220#action_12742220
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1357:
--
bq.My point is that when a user has already annotated t
19 matches
Mail list logo
