[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765983#action_12765983
]
pravin karne commented on SOLR-1395:
from where i can download KATTA-SOLR.patch
> Inte
Hello,
I Start Solr with Jetty using the following code. If the classpath and
src paths are set correctly in Eclipse and you pass the solr.home to the
VM on startup, you just have to start this class and you can debug Solr
in Eclipse.
import org.mortbay.jetty.Connector;
import org.mortbay.jetty.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766018#action_12766018
]
Aytek Ekici commented on SOLR-236:
--
Hi Martijn,
Thanks a lot it works.
Aytek
> Field colla
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766054#action_12766054
]
Jason Venner (www.prohadoop.com) commented on SOLR-1395:
It should a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766064#action_12766064
]
Anıl Çetin commented on SOLR-64:
Hi all,
I applied the patch to solr nightly (solr-2009-10-14
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766066#action_12766066
]
pravin karne commented on SOLR-1395:
hi
For solr patch i used following command:
patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766070#action_12766070
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-64:
--
that's the current design of this feature, as shown by th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766077#action_12766077
]
Jason Venner (www.prohadoop.com) commented on SOLR-1395:
My apologie
I just thought I'd toss a note out that in the main build.xml it's
fetching a outdated vesions of luke(0.9.1) and lucene(2.4).
For the solr 1.4 release, that should probably change to:
luke 0.9.9
lucene 2.9
-Colin
Active Media Architects, Inc.
World Class Design, Programming & Strategy - S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766081#action_12766081
]
Jason Venner (www.prohadoop.com) commented on SOLR-1395:
AFIK this w
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Ilan Rabinovitch wrote:
> Are the Wiki issues mentioned in previous threads resolved? I think I can
> at least lend a hand with a few clean up items for 1.4, but I dont want to
> make matters worse.
Unfortunately, they are not.
We need to be careful... and perha
point build.xml to luke 0.9.9
-
Key: SOLR-1512
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1512
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Ryan McKinley
Priority: Minor
Fix F
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-1512:
Attachment: SOLR-1512-luke.patch
pointing to luke 0.9.9
> point build.xml to luke 0.9.9
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley resolved SOLR-1512.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> point build.xml to luke 0.9.9
> -
>
>
thanks for pointing this out. Check: SOLR-1512, now fixed in trunk
thanks
ryan
On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Colin Hynes wrote:
I just thought I'd toss a note out that in the main build.xml it's
fetching a outdated vesions of luke(0.9.1) and lucene(2.4).
For the solr 1.4 release, that sh
No problem. Nice work. :D
On Oct 15, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
thanks for pointing this out. Check: SOLR-1512, now fixed in trunk
thanks
ryan
On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Colin Hynes wrote:
I just thought I'd toss a note out that in the main build.xml it's
fetching a outda
I think the Clustering example is up to date, but I'm curious if I
missed something. I will double check.
On Oct 14, 2009, at 4:43 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
The plan still seems to be to release next week. It's a great time to
update our documentation, esp the highly visible stuff like the m
Yes!!! A notification!
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Solr Wiki" for change
> notification.
>
> The "ExtractingRequestHandler" page has been changed by Yoni
: We would be glad to volunteer some time next week to go by the
: docs, and try to get the RC up and running. Is there a defined
: procedure of what might particularly need testing in the RC?
The most helpful testing users can do are the things that can't really be
tested in an automatic way wi
I believe there was no problem with notifications for regular edits. Only
trivial edits were not generating a notification.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> Yes!!! A notification!
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Apache Wik
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> I believe there was no problem with notifications for regular edits. Only
> trivial edits were not generating a notification.
In the past few days I've been making some non-trivial edits... no
notifications ever went out (until today
Use Google Collections in ConcurrentLRUCache
Key: SOLR-1513
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1513
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: search
Affects Vers
: upgrade to lucene 2.9.1-dev r824987
If we're switching back to our own jars, then doesn't that mean we need to
add back those custom pom.xml files for maven users? ...
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=819835
-Hoss
: A lng time ago, Doug pointed me at one of his nightly scripts (I
: forget if it was Lucene or Nutch)... and the first version was pretty
: much just a copy. I guess we could just drop the "-Dversion=nightly"?
it would make the lib loading look a lot cleaner in the examples ... but
it's no
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : upgrade to lucene 2.9.1-dev r824987
>
> If we're switching back to our own jars, then doesn't that mean we need to
> add back those custom pom.xml files for maven users? ...
*shrug* - the nightlies don't do anything with maven do they?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766352#action_12766352
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1513:
bq. Though I suppose Solr caches usually don't use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766356#action_12766356
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1513:
I've tuned down my caches to not deal with
: > : upgrade to lucene 2.9.1-dev r824987
: >
: > If we're switching back to our own jars, then doesn't that mean we need to
: > add back those custom pom.xml files for maven users? ...
:
: *shrug* - the nightlies don't do anything with maven do they?
i don't really understand what nightlies hav
On Oct 15, 2009, at 7:01 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: upgrade to lucene 2.9.1-dev r824987
If we're switching back to our own jars, then doesn't that mean we
need to
add back those custom pom.xml files for maven users? ...
Yes, we do.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revisio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766417#action_12766417
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1513:
--
bq.I've tuned down my caches to not deal with OOMs and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766419#action_12766419
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1513:
--
Actually google collections is a 600KB jar and I guess
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12766422#action_12766422
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1513:
-
bq. Actually google collections i
32 matches
Mail list logo
