Build failed in Hudson: Solr-trunk #1021

See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1021/ -- [...truncated 2334 lines...] [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 20.161 sec [junit] Running org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.LargeVolumeBinaryJettyTest

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Solr-trunk #1021

pl unsubscribe me On 1/3/10, Apache Hudson Server hud...@hudson.zones.apache.org wrote: See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1021/ -- [...truncated 2334 lines...] [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:

[jira] Created: (SOLR-1694) DocFrequencyValueSource

DocFrequencyValueSource --- Key: SOLR-1694 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1694 Project: Solr Issue Type: New Feature Components: search Reporter: Ryan McKinley Priority:

Re: highlighting setting in solrconfig.xml

: If this design is ok, I need to introduce new sub tags like : fragListBuilder/ and fragmentsBuilder/ in highlighting/ : in solrconfig.xml. But now I wonder why the highligher settings : are in such very original place rather than searchComponent/. : : Do we have any reason to keep

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1268) Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796075#action_12796075 ] Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-1268: -- I'm introducing fragListBuilder/ and

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1694) DocFrequencyValueSource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-1694: Attachment: SOLR-1694-DocFrequencyValueSource.patch This is a first draft, it gets the DF with:

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1694) DocFrequencyValueSource

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796079#action_12796079 ] Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-1694: - I don't know if folks think this is generally

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1602) Refactor SOLR package structure to include o.a.solr.response and move QueryResponseWriters in there

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796080#action_12796080 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1602: Uh ... ok. First off: Broad discussions beyond the scope

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1677) Add support for o.a.lucene.util.Version for BaseTokenizerFactory and BaseTokenFilterFactory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796087#action_12796087 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1677: bq. The problem is the default value. If you leave out the

[jira] Created: (SOLR-1695) Missleading error message when uniqueKey is field is missing

Missleading error message when uniqueKey is field is missing - Key: SOLR-1695 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1695 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1602) Refactor SOLR package structure to include o.a.solr.response and move QueryResponseWriters in there

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796108#action_12796108 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1602: - {quote} One that springs to mind