Remove duplicate field in schema.xml
Key: SOLR-1788
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1788
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Bill Bell
Is there a way to remove du
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated SOLR-1788:
Description:
Is there a way to remove duplicates in a multiValue field? For example if I add
the following
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837035#action_12837035
]
Chris Harris commented on SOLR-380:
---
This is an interesting patch. One current limitation s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Henson updated SOLR-1787:
-
Attachment: solr-1787.patch
First draft patch. Fairly straightforward.
> CachedSqlEntityProcessor
CachedSqlEntityProcessor pre-warmed cache use case
--
Key: SOLR-1787
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1787
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib - D
FYI: The page name seemed really confusing to me -- i realize it's the
title of the book in English (i think) but as a wiki page it seemed like
it would be really easy for people to assume the page itself was going to
be an introduction to Solr -- so i renamed it (and reformated it) to be
more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1786:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.5
marking Fix for 1.5 -- we shouldn't release w/o either moving forward or
rollingback the v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836933#action_12836933
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1772:
Actually my point is that the new FieldTypes make it *more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836930#action_12836930
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1687:
bq. Traditionally, this type of stuff is delegated to the f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836919#action_12836919
]
Peter Steevensz edited comment on SOLR-236 at 2/22/10 9:43 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836919#action_12836919
]
Peter Steevensz edited comment on SOLR-236 at 2/22/10 9:40 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836919#action_12836919
]
Peter Steevensz commented on SOLR-236:
--
I applied this patch to the nightlybuild of feb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836898#action_12836898
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1724:
Actually, I just realized the whole exercis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836896#action_12836896
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1724:
I'm taking the approach of simply reusing S
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
if it is not provided with setters , what do you suggest? provide it
with getters?
yes, i would like to have the @Field annotation at getters. and if there
is no reason against this i can provide a patch for DocumentObjectBinder
that adds getter annotation and
if it is not provided with setters , what do you suggest? provide it
with getters?
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Norman Wiechmann wrote:
>
>
> Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् schrieb:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Norman Wiechmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if there is a
Solr (trunk rev. 912116) suffers from PDFBOX-537 [Endless loop in
org.apache.pdfbox.pdfparser.BaseParser.parseCOSDictionary()] fixed in PDFbox
1.0?
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् schrieb:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Norman Wiechmann wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if there is a reason why the @Field annotation is restricted
to setters?
The preferred way is to apply the annotation to fields. it is provided
on setters also if you prefer the se
18 matches
Mail list logo