[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773386#action_12773386
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1541:
Why is a ticket created in the very first p
ature
Components: clients - java
Reporter: Avlesh Singh
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.5
The DocumentObjectBinder class should "bind" highlighting info in
QueryResponse, if specified by a end user. This can be achieved using an
annotated interface {...
Sure!
Cheers
Avlesh
2009/10/6 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> go ahead but mark for 1.5
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> > Does this one deserve a JIRA issue?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Avlesh
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:37 PM, A
Does this one deserve a JIRA issue?
Cheers
Avlesh
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> Like most others, I use SolrJ and bind my beans with @Field annotations to
> read responses from Solr.
> For highlighting these properties in my bean, I always write a separate
>
Like most others, I use SolrJ and bind my beans with @Field annotations to
read responses from Solr.
For highlighting these properties in my bean, I always write a separate
piece - Get the list of highlights from response and then use the
Map> to put them back in my original bean.
This evening, I
It is generally a good idea to cross check for a bug on the user/dev mailing
list and then create the issue, Luke.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Luke Forehand (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12751684#action_12751684
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1408:
bq. I am starting the jetty server from with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12748061#action_12748061
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1387:
{quote}
facet.iPrefix : this would act like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12747968#action_12747968
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1129:
There is already as issue for the above An
t.field={!prefix=foo prefix=bar}myfield
Filtering within facets is a good idea but lets limit the scope of this
enhancement to multiple "facet.prefix" values for any facet.field.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Av
21, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> > Different ways to look at it Yonik. For things that I have needed this
> for,
> > so far (field:A* OR field:B*) was just as fine.
>
> So if you asked for the top 10, yo
Different ways to look at it Yonik. For things that I have needed this for,
so far (field:A* OR field:B*) was just as fine.
Anyways, for me to file the ticket, what usage are we looking for? As
underneath?
facet.field=myField&f.foo.facet.prefix=foo&f.foo.facet.prefix=bar
How would sort, limit and
Hmmm ... it went a long way than I thought :)
i think Avlesh is just suggesting that...
> facet.field=foo & f.foo.facet.prefix=a & f.foo.facet.prefix=z
>
You are absolutely right, Hoss.
Until Yonik mentioned the "sort" behavior of facets, it never came into my
mind. My SQL analogy was .. "select
Or, may be just multiple facet.prefix values, Yonik; exactly the same as
facet.field works.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> > Should multiple values for facet.prefix be supported?
> > I h
Should multiple values for facet.prefix be supported?
I have come across several use-cases on the user mailing list where such a
functionality could have helped (The latest one being -
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/2a9c44d4f015b5e5/facet_filtering).
I ran into one such use last ni
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741915#action_12741915
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1357:
My point is that when a user has already annot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741910#action_12741910
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1357:
Well, I don't see a reason behind the
Reporter: Avlesh Singh
Adding data via {{SolrInputDocument}} is normally done by calling the
{{addField}} method with a field name, field value and an optional boost. In
case of dynamic fields, if field names are known upfront, then caller of this
method just passes in the right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741050#action_12741050
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1348:
I have used "cast()" function in My
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741047#action_12741047
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1352:
Thanks, once again :), for creating the ti
First of all, why this is a solr-dev question?
Second it seems you have some strong misconceptions regarding what Solr is,
and what it is supposed to do.
Read up a bit on Solr wiki and text analyzers. If you still have questions,
ask them on solr-user mailing list.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Sun, Aug 9, 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12740397#action_12740397
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-247:
---
I haven't tested this patch yet. But my
Sure Noble. I'll do it pretty soon.
Cheers
Avlesh
2009/8/3 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> > We are generally talking about two things here -
> >
> > 1. Speed up indexing in general by creating separate thread(s
n, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> >>> There can be a batch command (which) will take in multiple commands in
> one
> >>> http request.
> >>
> >> You seem to be obsessed with this approach, Noble. Solr-1093 also echoes
> the
> >
rces where batching might be difficult
to achieve in an abstract way, the user might choose to configure different
data-config.xml's (for different DIH instances) altogether.
Cheers
Avlesh
2009/8/2 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> >
nces, task assignment scheduling is done by "injecting"
limit and offset values in the import query for each DIH instance.
And this is, one of the reasons, why I call it a ParallelDataImportHandler.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> run the a
lelDataImportHandler. I believe
> it can be done in DIH itself
>
> you may not need to create a project in google code. you can open a
> JIRA issue and start posting patches and we can put it back into Solr.
>
> .
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Avlesh Singh wrot
In my quest to improve indexing time (in a multi-core environment), I tried
writing a Solr RequestHandler called ParallelDataImportHandler.
I had a few lame questions to begin with, which Noble and Shalin answered
here -
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/22b7371c063fdb06/using_dih_for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727919#action_12727919
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1129:
Good to go, Noble. I have tried and tested
I am ready to extend my helping hand Eric and Matthias for fixing the docs
and the js-code base (if need be).
I have recently started using SolrJS and I feel that this contrib is unable
to keep pace with enhancements in Solr.
I would have been an author, if not a programmer. Lemme know what all to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avlesh Singh updated SOLR-1129:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1129.patch
Just realized that the usage of {{field.matches("^"fieldName
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avlesh Singh updated SOLR-1129:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1129.patch
All the changes as discussed earlier, have been implemented.
SolrJ can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12709373#action_12709373
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1129:
Sorry for the delay. Will submit a patch lates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12702987#action_12702987
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1129:
All you points are taken, Noble.
I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avlesh Singh updated SOLR-1129:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1129.patch
Adding a patch for this enhancement.
Existing test cases pass. I'l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12702675#action_12702675
]
Avlesh Singh commented on SOLR-1129:
Thanks for creating this ticket, Noble.
I hav
Unless I am missing something, there seems to be no way for mapping my
"dynamicFields" in the index to a solrj bean.
I am using SolrQuery to fetch a QueryResponse object, and use
QueryResponse.getBeans(MyAnnotatedClass.class) to fetch beans mapped to my
index.
There is no way to map dynamic fields
37 matches
Mail list logo
