On Nov 7, 2006, at 2:10 PM, Hoss Man (JIRA) wrote:
I'm also not sure if it works in all cases: more testing of various
Containers would be good, as well as testing more complex
sitautions (ie: what if a class explicitly named as a plugin and
loaded by this new classloader then uses reflect
On May 26, 2006, at 9:52 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On May 26, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Mike Baranczak wrote:
On May 26, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Mike - thank you for your patience in refactoring what was
already working for
you into something more generalizable than you needed for
On May 26, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Mike - thank you for your patience in refactoring what was already
working for
you into something more generalizable than you needed for the
benefit of the >community. I personally will be experimenting
with this new feature.
Seconded! Th
On May 26, 2006, at 2:57 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
(would Solr ever need to use the XSD itself?)
Probably not at runtime, but it might be useful in unit testing, to
ensure that Solr is creating proper output.
I think the primary utility is for people who write code that has to
talk to Sol
On May 26, 2006, at 3:24 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: It is not necessary, and actually frowned upon (maybe even
prohibited
: by the ASF at this point) for there to be a real file responding to
: the *URI* which happens to be a WWW http:// *URL*. We're free to
: create whatever URI we want,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17?page=all ]
Mike Baranczak updated SOLR-17:
---
Attachment: solr-rev2.xsd
Revised the XSD so that the crazy file validates.
> XSD for solr requests/responses
> ---
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16?page=all ]
Mike Baranczak updated SOLR-16:
---
Attachment: OutputWriterTest.java
I've incorporated all of of Hoss' suggestions. All the units tests are passing,
and everything else looks good.
I d
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16?page=all ]
Mike Baranczak updated SOLR-16:
---
Attachment: custom_writer_rev3.patch
> patch to allow the use of a custom query output wri
This information is already being logged.
On May 23, 2006, at 8:29 PM, maustin75 wrote:
Would it be possible to create an init method for the
QueryResponseWriter interface and call it when the custom
XMLResponse is loaded. This will help so we can log and show which
is loaded similar to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17?page=comments#action_12413036 ]
Mike Baranczak commented on SOLR-17:
Just one question. What's the difference between a 'lst' and an 'arr'? From
what I can see in the enclosed sam
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16?page=comments#action_12413033 ]
Mike Baranczak commented on SOLR-16:
OK, I tried writing a test case like Hoss suggested and it kept failing when I
tried to select a custom writer. I eventually figured out
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16?page=comments#action_12412597 ]
Mike Baranczak commented on SOLR-16:
Yeah, I can write a test. I can't do it right now, but I'll probably get to it
sometime early next week.
> patch to allow
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16?page=all ]
Mike Baranczak updated SOLR-16:
---
Attachment: custom_writer_rev2.patch
Revised patch enclosed.
Multiple writers may be specified in solrconfig.xml. The syntax is pretty much
the same as for
XSD for solr requests/responses
---
Key: SOLR-17
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17
Project: Solr
Type: Improvement
Reporter: Mike Baranczak
Priority: Minor
Attachments: solr.xsd
Attaching an XML schema
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17?page=all ]
Mike Baranczak updated SOLR-17:
---
Attachment: solr.xsd
> XSD for solr requests/responses
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-17
> URL: http://issues.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16?page=comments#action_12412396 ]
Mike Baranczak commented on SOLR-16:
> I would like to see a request time toggle on the writer used, just like the
> request handler gets decided.
Using the same sel
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16?page=all ]
Mike Baranczak updated SOLR-16:
---
Attachment: custom_writer.patch
> patch to allow the use of a custom query output writer
> --
>
>
patch to allow the use of a custom query output writer
--
Key: SOLR-16
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16
Project: Solr
Type: New Feature
Components: search
Reporter: Mike Baranczak
This
On May 9, 2006, at 12:43 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On May 9, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Mike Baranczak wrote:
On May 9, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Right, I implemented this (patch pasted below)
Which file is this patch for?
StandardRequestHandler - and the patch may not apply
On May 9, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Right, I implemented this (patch pasted below)
Which file is this patch for?
-MB
(Sorry, sent prematurely...)
I'd like to integrate the Lucene highlighting classes into Solr. Can
anybody offer suggestions on where to start? I saw this on the Solr
task list, so there must be someone on this list who has at least
thought about this problem.
-MB
roves the loading of resources from
classpath
-
--
Key: SOLR-13
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13
Project: Solr
Type: Improvement
Environment: Mac OS 10.4.6, Java 1.5.0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13?page=all ]
Mike Baranczak updated SOLR-13:
---
Attachment: config.patch
patch submitted by Mike Baranczak of epublishing.com
> patch to Config class; improves the loading of resources from classp
10.4.6, Java 1.5.0_06, JBoss 4.0.1
Reporter: Mike Baranczak
Priority: Minor
If config files aren't found in the expected places, Config attempts to find
them on the classpath. The trouble is, it's using the current thread's context
classpath, which means that the web ap
First of all, I want to thank all of you. I was just assigned to
write a Lucene-based search server, when I found out that such a
system already existed and its name was Solr. You just saved me a lot
of work.
My question: what's the preferred way to submit patches? Should I
just send them
25 matches
Mail list logo