Congrats Uwe!! :)
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Welcome, Uwe!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> On 4/1/10 4:05 AM, "Grant Ignersoll" wrote:
>
> I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to add Uwe Schindler to
> the PMC. Uwe has been doing a lot of work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12786635#action_12786635
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-785:
--
FYI
bq. Those changes are not yet ported to
Afaik, there was a discussion about this recently (can't remember
where). Lucene and its sub projects used to set the version number in
build.xml to the release number but this has been changed to the
current dev version.
simon
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
> The distribu
Fingers crossed!!!
simon
On 1/12/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Lucene PMC has voted to accept Solr, and I've called a vote in the
Incubator.
If you have a binding vote there, please vote!
-Yonik
On 1/8/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote has passed, and I
+1
simon
On 1/5/07, Bill Au <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Bill
On 1/5/07, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Otis
>
> - Original Message
> From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2007 3:29:36 PM
> Subjec
Oh by the way I do have 2 people in this room being able to find
collisions to md5 within the next 15 minutes. But it is true that this
is quiet hypothetical .
anyway...
yours simon
On 12/8/06, Simon Willnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
True, so do it proper if you can.
best regards
better, but this clearly
isn't the type of thing that should hold up a Solr release!
phil.
On Dec 8, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm wondering why people still use MD5 for digital signatures and / or
> checksums.
> Recent results on the analysis
Hello,
I'm wondering why people still use MD5 for digital signatures and / or
checksums.
Recent results on the analysis of MD5 reduce the effort to find
collisions to a few minutes on an old notebook. Thus, collision and
multi-collision attacks on MD5 are feasible and practical.
I would recommend
Hey,
the Solr NightlyBuild gives me a very hard time to convince my boss to
use Solr at all for many reasons. I guess I can not expect any tags,
branches or releases within the next week, right?!
Is there any point why no "stable" / release version is available at
the moment?
best regards Simon
+1
On 9/12/06, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should Solr have a tab on Lucene's home page? Other incubating
Lucene-related projects do. I think it would be appropriate.
Doug
10 matches
Mail list logo
