Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "FunctionQuery" by GrantIngersoll

2009-12-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Dec 27, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >> On Dec 24, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >> >>> I've noticed that the docs for geo related functions have introduced >>> the notion of ValueSource. That's at the Java leve

Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "FunctionQuery" by GrantIngersoll

2009-12-27 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Dec 24, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> I've noticed that the docs for geo related functions have introduced >> the notion of ValueSource.  That's at the Java level, and in the past >> I've tried to keep http://wiki.apache.o

Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "FunctionQuery" by GrantIngersoll

2009-12-27 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Dec 24, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > I've noticed that the docs for geo related functions have introduced > the notion of ValueSource. That's at the Java level, and in the past > I've tried to keep http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery > completely away from that. > Feel free

Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "FunctionQuery" by GrantIngersoll

2009-12-24 Thread Yonik Seeley
I've noticed that the docs for geo related functions have introduced the notion of ValueSource. That's at the Java level, and in the past I've tried to keep http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery completely away from that. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 7:21 A

Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "FunctionQuery" by GrantIngersoll

2009-11-16 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Nov 15, 2009, at 8:16 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Let's all try to summarize changes to the wiki as we would changes to > the code - without that it's tough to tell what the changes are. > > In this particular case, I'm not sure if all of the formatting changes > were deliberate or accidental.

Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "FunctionQuery" by GrantIngersoll

2009-11-15 Thread Yonik Seeley
Let's all try to summarize changes to the wiki as we would changes to the code - without that it's tough to tell what the changes are. In this particular case, I'm not sure if all of the formatting changes were deliberate or accidental. If accidental, I wonder if the cause was a bug in GUI mode,