[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499439
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
I think the issue with persistent connections on linux is due to Nagle's
algori
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499417
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
Hmmm, some bad interaction with persistent connections and POST (which solr.py
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499413
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
On that Opteron Linux box, almost identical numbers for Resin 3.0 pro, so it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499409
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
The 10,000 single-client connection test on a dual Opteron, RHEL4 64 bit, Java5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499407
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
Switching to the non-NIO connector in Jetty 6.1.3, I get
18.2s for persistent co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499364
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
Doing some quick connection handling tests with the python client:
from solr imp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498729
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
Yeah, I saw that hadoop issue too, which is why I was planning on some quick
ind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498534
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-128:
---
I'm using 6.1.3 in a pre-production project.
I do see Hadoop guys hit a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498345
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-128:
applied to rev541050
If anything goes wrong, we need to revert /example/ to r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498335
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
OK, let's quickly go ahead then. There have been some JSP issues with our
curr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498333
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-128:
It has been working fine for me, but I have not been using it in production or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498329
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
Any opinions on if we should put in Jetty 6.1.3 now, or wait until after Solr
1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470960
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-128:
---
I think we want to wait with the newest Jetty. I'm on the jetty ML, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468758
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-128:
I'm not suggesting we drop JSP *now*... just that we definitely should not be
:
: The disad to getting rid of JSPs is it would make it much harder for
: someone to easily improve the look or functionality of the admin pages.
"look" could be improved with XSLT in most cases yes/no? ... as for
functionality ... it's not like we are leveraging a lot of JSP code
siplcations --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468750
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
The disad to getting rid of JSPs is it would make it much harder for someone to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468749
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
When you go to the download link:
http://dist.codehaus.org/jetty/
> Include New
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468746
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-128:
Ideally we could replace existing JSP with servlets or SolrRequestHandlers. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468660
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
BTW, there's a Jetty 6.1.1 out...
> Include Newer version of Jetty
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468647
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-128:
---
We could probably ditch the JMX stuff as we don't currently use it... or does
J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468588
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-128:
I tried running the example with jetty 6.1. In less then 5 mins, I had
every
21 matches
Mail list logo
