[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12648482#action_12648482
]
noble.paul edited comment on SOLR-867 at 11/17/08 7:59 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Why is this done this way ? . The current solution involves the overhead
marshalling and unmarshalling. I guess it can be easily avoided.
you may need to duplicate some code from BinaryResponseWriter#writeDocList().
But the amount of code is minimal
was (Author: noble.paul):
Why is this done this way ? . The current solution involves the overhead
marshalling and unmarshalling. I guess it can be easily avoided.
you may need to duplicate some code from BinaryResponseWriter#writeDocList()
and BinaryResponseWriter#getDoc(). But the amount of code is minimal
> move EmbeddedSolrServer#getParsedResponse to utility class
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-867
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-867
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: clients - java
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Assignee: Ryan McKinley
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-867-move-getParsedResponse.patch,
> SOLR-867-move-getParsedResponse.patch
>
>
> The utility function: EmbeddedSolrServer#getParsedResponse should be moved to
> a utiltiy class.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
