Re: Efficient Query Evaluation using a Two-Level Retrieval Process

2009-11-16 Thread J. Delgado
t; On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < >> shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey Joaquin, >>> >>> The mailing list strips off attachments. Can you please upload it somewhere >>> and give us the link? >>> >>> On

Re: Efficient Query Evaluation using a Two-Level Retrieval Process

2009-11-16 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
cient Query Evaluation using a Two-Level Retrieval Process". I believe that such approach may improve the way Lucene/Solr evaluates queries today. The functionality of WAND (weak AND) is already implemented in Lucene, if I understand it correctly - this is the BooleanQuery.setMinShouldMa

Re: Efficient Query Evaluation using a Two-Level Retrieval Process

2009-11-16 Thread J. Delgado
tached the paper on "Efficient Query Evaluation using a > > Two-Level Retrieval Process". I believe that such approach may improve > the > > way Lucene/Solr evaluates queries today. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- Joaquin > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >

Re: Efficient Query Evaluation using a Two-Level Retrieval Process

2009-11-15 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
Hey Joaquin, The mailing list strips off attachments. Can you please upload it somewhere and give us the link? On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:35 PM, J. Delgado wrote: > Please find attached the paper on "Efficient Query Evaluation using a > Two-Level Retrieval Process". I believe th

Efficient Query Evaluation using a Two-Level Retrieval Process

2009-11-15 Thread J. Delgado
Please find attached the paper on "Efficient Query Evaluation using a Two-Level Retrieval Process". I believe that such approach may improve the way Lucene/Solr evaluates queries today. Cheers, -- Joaquin