On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : interesting - it sounds to me more like shards than multicore, doesn't
> it? ... : but instead of querying all shards for results, only the shards
> that are
>
> it's somewhat an amalgam of both ... there's th
: interesting - it sounds to me more like shards than multicore, doesn't it? ...
: but instead of querying all shards for results, only the shards that are
it's somewhat an amalgam of both ... there's the "index" aspect and the
"query" aspect ... you can imagine sending data to one Solr master a
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just came across http://wiki.apache.org/solr/IndexPartitioning . Does anyone
> think we still need this idea (vs. MultiCore)?
>
interesting - it sounds to me more like shards than multic
Just came across http://wiki.apache.org/solr/IndexPartitioning . Does anyone
think we still need this idea (vs. MultiCore)?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
