I'm on the Jetty side of the fence when it comes to the Tomcat debate
personally. Jetty has always been very fast and running "java -jar
start.jar" is so much more pleasant than I've experienced with
Tomcat. If someone wants to push Tomcat in so that it can be run in
a similarly fast and
I'm OK with a downgrade... there wasn't any particular reason to go
with Jetty6 other than it was the latest-and-greatest.
There is still the tomcat vs jetty issue though:
http://www.nabble.com/tutorial-or-demo-download-t1121522.html#a2933223
It does seem like the first thing many people try to d
+1 my personal preference is always to use the stable/production version.
Bill
On 4/24/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had trouble returning a field from Solr (as detailed in a previous
> e-mail) using the built-in Jetty. It worked fine with Tomcat, and I
> just tried it with J
I had trouble returning a field from Solr (as detailed in a previous
e-mail) using the built-in Jetty. It worked fine with Tomcat, and I
just tried it with Jetty 5.1.11RC0 and it works as well. It seems
the Jetty version in Solr's repository is an "unstable" version that
has some type of
