__
> From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 11:06:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Katta's goodness for Solr
>
> The way we do distributed search is not straight forward . Int
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 11:06:21 PM
Subject: Re: Katta's goodness for Solr
The way we do dis
The way we do distributed search is not straight forward . Introducing
extra layers (LoadBalancers) in between the shards looks like a hack
to me. Moreover , passing in the shard URL in the request is not a
very nice design The clients should be ideally unaware of the fact
that they are doing a dis
On Nov 11, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Quick thought. I saw Stefan's Katta presentation last night. Katta
seems nice and simple. If I understood correctly, juicy stuff that
is interesting to Solr is:
- Katta has a notion of a Primary Master and N Secondary Slaves (no
SPOF
Quick thought. I saw Stefan's Katta presentation last night. Katta seems nice
and simple. If I understood correctly, juicy stuff that is interesting to Solr
is:
- Katta has a notion of a Primary Master and N Secondary Slaves (no SPOF there)
- Search Nodes serve index shards copied locally from
