forget I suggested it...
I just tried implementing it, and the changes are more substantial
then I imagined.
On Jul 22, 2008, at 12:06 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
I do not think it makes any difference.SolrDocument is already
Serializable. And it is clean in the current form. .
I do not think it makes any difference.SolrDocument is already
Serializable. And it is clean in the current form. . Moreover, if your
using POJO's (DocumentObjectBinder), we use reflection to insert
fields where it is possible to insert a non-serializable object.
generic type information is a compi
How do you all feel about forcing the fields in SolrDocument to be
Serializable?
from
private Map _fields = null;
to:
private Map _fields = null;
likewise with SolrInputField?
from:
Object value = null;
to
Serializable value = null;
Everything we are pumping into these fields is serial
